Thứ Năm, 7 tháng 2, 2019

Auto news on Youtube Feb 8 2019

Introducing the MotionArm Smart Positioning Tool Arms, a tool positioning system with

powerful software for quick and easy programming and tightening execution.

The MotionArms feature a touch screen HMI and web-based control software with real-time

updates and operator feedback.

Multiple tool communication methods are available such as TCP/IP, serial and digital I/O.

The software won't allow the tool to activate unless it's in the proper position.

Programming a job is done directly on the controller and uses the tools current position

to record steps.

An overlay image can also be added to help guide operators to the next screw position.

The MotionArms have integrated WiFi capability so the web-based software can be accessed

by any computer or mobile device on the same network.

This allows users to monitor what jobs are being worked in real-time from anywhere that

has network coverage.

Remote users can also edit existing job's tolerances, set active jobs, view all created

programs and more.

The MotionArm comes in 3 standard sizes, the 30, the 150 and the 600.

Our open-sourced software and MotionArm platform can be customized for a variety of applications

such as assembly, soldering, dispensing and more.

Contact us today for more information.

For more infomation >> MotionArm Smart Positioning Tool Arms - Duration: 1:26.

-------------------------------------------

OFFICIAL VIDEO 🔊🔊🔊 RINDU 🎶 🎶 YANGSEKU || @ Smart Anggie - Duration: 7:29.

For more infomation >> OFFICIAL VIDEO 🔊🔊🔊 RINDU 🎶 🎶 YANGSEKU || @ Smart Anggie - Duration: 7:29.

-------------------------------------------

Alexa vs Google Home | Smart Home – Episódio 1 - Duration: 19:10.

Hi guys, I'm André

and today I bring you the Echo Dot from Amazon

mostly known by everyone as Alexa

this is the great product for smart homes

if we need an assistant, no doubt that Alexa will help us

- Alexa ?? Oh, you must be kidding.

everybody knows the best assistant is Google Home

Oh man, move you don't understand anything of this

Well, good folks.

I am André and I bring you here today. the Google Home Mini

this is the great assistant for smart homes

- NO IT'S NOT!

"Don't look me like that ..."

Everyone knows that this is linked to the Google House

and with that we can do all the management

But this was the first, this is the pioneer - And?

Everyone knows this is linked to a google system.

a smarter system

and more advanced system ...

- But what are you guys doing there?!?

Go out of Setup

Sorry guys

but my inner voices sometimes creates a big mess

Come on, let's go

today's episode is about smart homes

Let's start the first episode of Smart House

and nothing like starting it with the base

What is the best assistant in the market?

In today's episode I bring you a comparison between Alexa (from Amazon) and Google Home

in this case see which one has the advantage and when we choose

which Assistant will link to all smart house items

see which is the best

but let's find out more

coming next

Hi guys! I'm André

and today I bring you the ones I consider

the 2 best Assistants in the market

On the one hand, we have here our Google Home

on the other side, Alexa

From now on, every time I refer to them

every time a nun is going to be

will be: "this friend"

"and this one"

every time I say the command "Alexa"

As you can see, it activates

And Google, activate with:

"Hey Google"

You do not see but she turned on the lights.

now let's see then how they behave both in terms of speed

"Hey Google" "Switch the logo to green"

As you saw, the logo there. behind turned green

"Alexa! "Change the logo to purple"

Alexa is slightly faster to change. I went back to say the name she re-activated

During this video, what I will do is: when you hear me giving a command

I'm going to remove the sound.

so that who has these systems at home

and you are listening at high volume

do not activate the controls on your system

When we ask to turn off the light

she turn off on the division in which she knows she is

that is, it turned off the setup lights

Did not turn these off, what are you watching?

because these are softboxes and are plugged in

If you give it the indication "Turn off the light"

it shuts off the ones in the room

If I give you the indication "Turn off all the lights"

What she does is turn off all from home

One of the things, and one of the great differences between the two is:

When this friend here does an action, she repeats and says what the action did

this one only responds "ok"

there is feedback on what I in this case requested

Let's now test what their relationship is as Assistant

What it does is seek recognition voice that has

From there, she used a name for which I asked her to treat me

I have to increase my self-esteem somehow, and since you do not give the likes down the box

and do not leave comments

I have to tell my friend to tell me several times a day

If someone else asks the question

she will give information about the person asking the question

each one has his own account and according to his voice, thus comes to the recognition of the question

Already a Alexa is needed a configuration higher and in this case

you saw it came to its own account and said which account was being used

for the information of what is being collected

On the one hand, this friend knows everything about us

Do you know where we are?

knowing that we do

Do you know where we are going?

because it is linked to our account Google

this one has no idea of ​​the information

you do not have to

because we do not load it daily on Amazon servers

knows we buy

who shops by Amazon

but do not know much more, not be the information we give you from the

this one knows for the things we're all interacting with

who has (in this case) a Google account

another thing that is: in terms of location

She does not know where I am for a reason.

the majority of applications in Portugal It does not work for this girl.

do not work for her in Portugal that is, for example

I have a Logitech Harmony Device

which is a command that works with the smartphone by voice

and I can change the channels of the television by voice

I can not with her

configure for not being in portugal or so I've had the bill

type as if they were out of location or as UK and then retired

for her to access this service

already here

initially did not work in portugal but has had updates

and is already one of the things that works here on google home

is in this case the harmony of logitech

And what are you going to do now?

send directly to the device a link to the app

So we'll set the calendar later.

here is a fully configured calendar automatically

here, a calendar that still requires configuration

now, as we can see, both are assistants

both respond to various types of commands

both have multiple programmed responses various kinds of things scheduled

I can show you, for example, the jokes

This girl works great while assistant

in the personal relationship with people

or while I ask you for a joke,

she managed not only to use a joke of a famous person

and ask if we want it to be (or not) to continue to tell the jokes going forward

or you can go back to it

Let's see how our Google behaves.

How could you see This gave me exactly what I wanted.

gave me up to a pretty good

This works best relationship with us, that is

it allows us to choose whether we want it, or whether we prefer a second or third one to do so

Let's test here something else that is

get them talking to each other

as you could see, they are already so programmed at a certain level

and already have detected that the other is the great rival They already have some answers.

the others Let's try the other way around.

now what they can do, in addition to controlling the house

in addition to giving us what is in our calendars, they are able to have those specific tasks

Let's give an example.

how could you see any one of them responds perfectly to the calculations

What's the big advantage of this? This matters

think about your children in the future your children will have an assistant of these

resting on the table and that story of being accountable, they will not do it

What are they going to say?

They will say: ... make me the bill and tell me the result

square root of 4 2 squared

As you can see I was excusing from doing the bill.

He does the bill for me.

I'll just write the results

on the one hand it can be said that the children will become more dumb

They will not know how to do it.

it's a way of seeing

in this case you have simpler access to information I will not go there.

You can see, I gave her the indication in a minute.

who says one says what you want 20 minutes is what you want

that is, I'm working and I need her to let me know in time X

timers, timers and etc. both do, both are great

is not there how it takes advantage over the other

information Let's find out which one is smarter.

and the information they give us

We can now test anything else in the local panorama.

Is it?

maybe you already know more than us

maybe she hears the fake news and pick up anything

how could you see

This friend has a much larger database she can search on google and it's them

and can get the most concrete answer

I gave the case of a Portuguese soccer player

and she's going to get me exactly who he is here is a search for the term more

important with words and she will try to look for something

so here in this case failed

now one of the uses of the our assistant is the part of music

they have built-in speakers these are the mini versions of each one

the mini and the dot

are the small versions of each in this case we will not see great sound

will be normal and they are just prepared to

be pure assistants

this is the great conclusion that can be

take this video

And ready This is the great conclusion

none of them is better than the other

are just different

and in my opinion this is the best, This is the one I use at home.

I still have not got rid of Alexa because it makes sense for me to keep the technology

to go figure out how it works

and there was even a time when she was better

At this moment Google Home is evolving at a very fast speed

Just for you to see the example I gave the remote control

that did not work

and not long ago they made an update and it worked very well

In addition I have several things connected here at home

from outlets, temperature management, lights everything you can imagine

and that's what I'll bring in other videos That's What I'll Do Unboxings & Reviews

in the next videos about smart house

if you have any questions about any use

both from Alexa itself and from Google, leaving

leave in the comment box that I can not only make a second video explaining all the

doubts you had as I can even do mini videos eg for for on Instagram

I'll leave my Instagram down follow, and I'll make mini videos

with things you can ask me for each

I think it's going to be a funny thing

on the other hand, if they liked, do not forget

leave yours like, subscribe the channel, who has not yet subscribed

that this is just the first episode about smart home

I will bring much more

one of the next videos I will also bring the types of Google Home

that exist for anyone who is interested in Google Home and can also explain

what Alexa types are there

in terms of columns, screens

For me, that's all. I hope you enjoyed

To the next!!!

For more infomation >> Alexa vs Google Home | Smart Home – Episódio 1 - Duration: 19:10.

-------------------------------------------

Smart Underwear To Prevent Back Pain - Duration: 2:31.

For more infomation >> Smart Underwear To Prevent Back Pain - Duration: 2:31.

-------------------------------------------

Smart Mind - English - Using the Past Simple - Duration: 5:55.

In this video you will learn:

USING THE PAST SIMPLE

On the left side you have the menu that will guide you.

This is the basic past tense.

We use it whenever we want to talk about the past and we don't have any special situation

that means we should use the past perfect, present perfect or past continuous.

Finished actions, states or habits in the past.

1: We use it with finished actions, states or habits in the past when we have a finished

time word (yesterday, last week, at 2 o'clock, in 2003).

· I went to the cinema yesterday.

· We spent a lot of time Japan in 2007.

2: We use it with finished actions, states or habits in the past when we know from general

knowledge that the time period has finished.

This includes when the person we are talking about is dead.

· Leonardo painted the Mona Lisa.

· The Vikings invaded Britain.

3: We use it with finished actions, states or habits in the past that we have introduced

with the present perfect or another tense.

This is sometimes called 'details of news'.

· I've hurt my leg.

I fell off a ladder when I was painting my bedroom.

· I've been on holiday.

I went to Spain and Portugal.

4: For stories or lists of events, we often use the past simple for the actions in the

story and the past continuous for the background.

· He went to a coffee shop.

People were chatting and music was playing.

He sat down and ordered a coffee.

Unreal or imaginary things in the present or future.

5: We use the past simple to talk about things that are not real in the present or future.

So we use it with the second conditional and after words like 'wish'.

· If I won the lottery, I would buy a house.

· I wish I had more time!

Which forms are the correct ones ? A-PAST SIMPLE

B-CONDITIONAL CLAUSE C-OTHER

1 – I was an immigrant, last year ! 2 – After what my boss has told me, I went

the office to finish the work.

3 – He had studied a lot, last week so yesterday he has rested.

4 – I wish I went to Canada so I could visit her.

The answers are:

1 – I was an immigrant, last year ! A-PAST SIMPLE

2 – After what my boss has told me, I went the office to finish the work.

A-PAST SIMPLE 3 – He had studied a lot, last week so yesterday

he has rested.

C-OTHER

4 – I wish I went to Canada so I could visit her.

B-CONDITIONAL CLAUSE

Explore the website of Canada Smart Mind.

You can enjoy yourself learning English , French and the Canadian Immigration Process.

Check the links bellow.

Make a difference ! That's it !

Thanks so much for watching this video.

See you again, next time !

For more infomation >> Smart Mind - English - Using the Past Simple - Duration: 5:55.

-------------------------------------------

Is There Life on Earth? - Duration: 10:05.

Hey Smart People, Joe here.

Yes.

The answer to the question in the title of this video… is YES.

There is life on Earth.

We know that because, well we live here.

But what would we think if we were looking at Earth from 6 million km away?

That's the distance from which Voyager 1 captured this image on February 14, 1990;

all the complexity of our living planet summed up in a single pixel of bluish light.

Now, if one day some extraterrestrials download that image off of Voyager, how would they

be able to tell there's life on Earth, based on… that?

This is the question we face as we get ready to aim the most powerful telescopes ever built

at distant worlds outside our solar system.

If we're gonna search for signs of life… what exactly are we searching for?

Since the discovery of the first exoplanet–a planet orbiting a star outside our own solar

system–in 1992, we've confirmed the existence of almost 4,000 distant worlds.

Scientists think every star in the sky may host at least one planet of its own.

More than 2,000 exoplanets were discovered by the Kepler Space Telescope–moment of

silence.

Never going to forget you.

Looking at artistic renditions of these alien worlds, if you didn't know better, you might

think we can just point a big telescope at an exoplanet and snap an image of it.

But Kepler's raw data looks less like this, and more like this.

Kepler would stare at one spot in the sky, looking for stars that dimmed as an exoplanet

crossed in front of them, blocking some of their light.

By putting together a bunch of data like the size of the star, how much light is blocked,

how often the planet passes in front, then we can estimate the size and mass of the exoplanet.

And if you know how big something is and you know its mass, you know its density, like

if it's a gassy planet or a rocky one.

And because we've studied how orbits work in our own solar system, that same data can

tell us how far an exoplanet orbits from its star.

Finally, if we measure how hot a star is (by looking at the color of its light), we can

tell if a planet has the right conditions where liquid water, or as I call it… "life

juice"… *could* exist on its surface.

Based on all this, we've learned some exoplanets are tiny ice-Earths, some are these big warm

Neptunes, even hot Jupiters… and only some are potentially habitable.

But there's a big difference between could have life and does have life… to tell the

difference, we need to see something that could only be made by life.

I'm not talking intelligent life, or even complex life.

The tiniest puddle of replicating pond scum on an exoplanet would still be the biggest

discovery we've ever made, ever, about anything.

We need to find… biosignatures.

So, a "biosignature" is like a chemical fossil.

Something we can see that must be produced by life, and–this is important–it can't

be made by some natural process.

So what the heck counts as a biosignature?

Voyager 1's "Pale Blue Dot" is the Earth-selfie Carl Sagan is famous for, but he had a different

one taken a few years later that not many people know about.

In 1993, as the Galileo spacecraft passed by Earth on its way to Jupiter, it turned

its sensors towards our home planet, to ask "if we had no previous knowledge of whether

Earth was home to life, would we actually be able to detect any of our own biosignatures?"

So, life on Earth has been around for at least three and a half billion years, and biology

has changed the atmosphere in some pretttty BIG ways during that time.

Take these chemicals.

Here's what their levels would be on a dead Earth, versus what they actually are.

Sagan was looking for a kind of "chemical disequilibrium"– basically you look for

chemicals that shouldn't be there, and if you find them, there must be something on

the planet consistently making them.

And when he looked at Earth… he found… water.

Which actually wasn't very hard.

H2O turns out to be one of the most abundant molecules in the universe.

Liquid water is a necessary ingredient for life, but it's not a sign of life.

Galileo also found methane.

Methane breaks down really fast in a planet's atmosphere, so if you find it that means something

is making it.

Here on Earth it's made by microbes and by burping cows–we have a lot of both.

But, there are natural processes that can make methane too, so it doesn't necessarily

mean "life".

We've also detected methane on Mars, and Saturn's moon Titan has lakes of the stuff.

No sign of life on either of those.

Well how about carbon dioxide?

I'm alive, and I make it… but so do volcanoes.

Not a perfect biosignature.

Ok, what about oxygen?

O2 was incredibly toxic to Earth's earliest life forms, and for the first billion years

of life there wasn't much of it around… until photosynthesis showed up and started

just throwing it away.

Today this previously poisonous photosynthetic trash gives us life.

But not so fast.

You guessed it, there are natural processes that can make O2… too.

Like on super-hot planets, ultraviolet light can break down water, kick out the hydrogen,

and leave oxygen behind.

But the levels of oxygen and methane that the Galileo measured on Earth were way higher

than those natural processes would predict.

This was the "chemical disequilibrium" Sagan was looking for.

But it still wasn't a smoking gun, just suggested life as a possibility.

A maybe.

Sagan did find one other biosignature on Earth that was especially weird.

On lighter areas of the planet's surface–dry land–there were massive areas that absorbed

red light, and just beyond that, into the infrared part of the spectrum, a whole bunch

of light that wasn't absorbed.

Since no rock or mineral that we know of absorbs red light quite like this, the best explanation

was a pigment covering the planet's surface, one that absorbs red light, and hates near-infrared

light.

That pigment?

Well, we know it as chlorophyll.

It absorbs red and blue light, but not other colors, and that's why so much of Earth

is green.

This biosignature is known as the "vegetation red edge"

Since Sagan's little Galileo experiment, scientists have added to the list of possible

biosignatures and they've learned a lot about how we might tell them apart from natural

processes.

In general, we know different chemicals absorb different colors of light.

So if we can somehow measure how an exoplanet's atmosphere filters light from its star, we

can get a fingerprint of all the chemicals in that atmosphere.

Now that we know what to look for, how do we detect these signatures from light years

away?

The best study of Earth-like planets will come from looking at light from the host star

reflected off the planet and filtered by the atmosphere.

Basically the same way we take pictures of Earth today, only much, much, MUCH farther

away.

Thing is, Earth-sized planets are about ten billion times dimmer than their stars, and

exoplanets are separated from their star by *extremely* small angles.

Directly imaging an exoplanet is like trying to see a moth buzzing around a searchlight,

on top of the Eiffel Tower, from New York City.

To do this, astronomers have designed starshades, which can be placed tens of thousands of kilometers

in front of orbiting space telescopes, to precisely block out the star's light and

make the exoplanets visible, the way blocking out a car's headlights with our hand helps

us see at night.

Of course we only know the signs of life as it exists here, the only place we've found

it.

Somewhere else, life may use completely different chemistry, giving off completely different

biosignatures.

And even here on Earth, life hasn't always looked the same.

Back in the ancient Archaean Era, early life forms lived under a cloudy methane haze.

And the first photosynthesizers may have been purple microbes, not green.

This would all be SO much easier if we could just sense some convenient radio signal coming

from an exoplanet, sent by an intelligent technological life form.

But when you consider human technological civilization only covers 0.000002% of our

planet's history, our chances of listening in the right place at the right time are not

great.

We're looking at the very edge of what is technologically possible, so best not to hold

your breath on finding alien life just yet.

Stay curious.

Notice anything different?

Oh yeah, I got a haircut.

For more infomation >> Is There Life on Earth? - Duration: 10:05.

-------------------------------------------

Revolutionize your #SmartHome with the #LyraVoice All-In-One Smart Voice Router - Duration: 1:42.

Good morning, Enzo,

your first event starts in one hour.

I'm super famous musician and DJ, Enzo Martini,

and I almost just missed the most important audition

of my life.

It's a good thing we've got

the new ASUS Lyra Voice Wi-Fi router

and smart speaker with Alexa built right in.

You can actually talk to your Wi-Fi router now.

Check this out.

Alexa, can you play my ultra wakeup playlist?

Okay, playing ultra wakeup playlist.

Woo!

Thanks, Alexa!

ASUS Lyra Voice is the newest, coolest 3 in 1 device.

It's not only a super powerful dual stereo Bluetooth speaker,

it's also a Wi-Fi mesh system

that improves the coverage of our current Wi-Fi network,

which is why all of our devices

work so perfectly all around the house,

even outside by the pool!

Right, babe?

You can put ASUS Lyra Voice anywhere you need stable Wi-Fi

and a smart assistant,

plus it's super easy to connect it

to a ton of smart devices all around the home.

Isn't that right, crew?

(ding)

(dong)

They know what's up.

ASUS Lyra Voice turns your regular dumb home

into a super smart home that helps you get things done

without even having to lift a finger.

It's time to empower your voice

and turbocharge your Wi-Fi with ASUS Lyra Voice.

Now, it's off to my audition.

Alexa, can you start my car?

(engine revving)

Nice.

For more infomation >> Revolutionize your #SmartHome with the #LyraVoice All-In-One Smart Voice Router - Duration: 1:42.

-------------------------------------------

Are Smart TVs Too Smart? (Teaser) | Consumer Reports - Duration: 0:49.

[SNAP]

Ah, time to watch some TV.

Whoa.

Binge watching TV again, Jack?

I'll be sure to tell the advertisers.

Good thing your TV provider doesn't charge by the hour.

Wait, is my smart TV watching me?

[SNAP]

For more infomation >> Are Smart TVs Too Smart? (Teaser) | Consumer Reports - Duration: 0:49.

-------------------------------------------

如何使用 HP Smart 从手机或平板电脑打印 | HP 打印机 | HP - Duration: 1:28.

For more infomation >> 如何使用 HP Smart 从手机或平板电脑打印 | HP 打印机 | HP - Duration: 1:28.

-------------------------------------------

Taking a pause on Michael Cohen testimony is smart opinion - Duration: 3:03.

Taking a pause on Michael Cohen testimony is smart opinion

As of now, however, these Democrat led committees seem to be shifting course. The Intelligence Committee Cohens subpoenaed testimony scheduled for February 8 until the end of the month, at the same time announcing a broad investigation into conflicts of interest in the Trump administration. And for its part, the Oversight Committee has not Cohens original appearance date of February 7 after Cohen canceled it.

Fortunately, the House committees are paying no attention to President Donald Trumps contention in the State of the Union speech that, "If there is going to be peace and legislation, there cannot be war and investigation."

"It just doesnt work that way," the President added.

All of this is very good news.

Its not so much that Cohen doesnt have anything worthwhile to share; indeed, given that we now know during some of his prior testimony, it makes sense to have him testify at some point so that he can correct that record. But we also know that any will answer none of the questions of true interest to those hoping to hold the Trump campaign and administration accountable, because of the ongoing criminal investigations. And even though Cohen can answer more questions in closed session, the topics likely to be explored most prominently, the Trump Tower Moscow deal and the hush money payments are under active investigation by the Office of the Special Counsel and the U.S. Attorneys Office for the Southern District of New York.

With all due respect to the House Democrats, they should leave these matters to law enforcement and do what they can do well: finding and exposing conflicts of interest and other possible fraud and corruption of the sort suspected by ethics since even before the inauguration, when the President refused to divest from his businesses or release his tax returns.

The list is long, but of the specific topics described this week by the House Intelligence Committee, one is rightfully front and center: the Trump Organizations pursuit of foreign business deals, including specifically whether US policy is being set on the basis of the Presidents in places like Russia, , and , among others; Trump having such interests.

Congress should explore whether Jared Kushner is benefiting from the program, which his wife Ivanka worked on though through a spokesperson she has adhered to all ethics rules , and more generally whether his companys vast debts, financial dealings and foreign contracts with countries like China and Qatarwith US government actions. Kushner Companies has that Jared Kushners White House position has no bearing on their financial dealings.

There are numerous ways that the President and his family are from the presidency, including massive taxpayer outlays to Trump properties and businesses for things like room rentals for the Secret Service, and for Donald Jr. and Eric Trump as they travel on Trump Organization business. Also, there have been governmental actions like reported evidence of the Presidents interference in the issue of whether to , which might have had a bearing on the business prospects of the nearby Trump hotel and the GSA leasesurrounding the Trump International Hotel at the Old Post Office that suggest official decisions may have been made for personal benefit.

White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders, "The President wanted to save the government money and also the FBI leadership did not want to move its headquarters."

Foreign government officials have been open about patronizing Trump hotels and properties, raising questions of whether the President is improperly gifts from foreign sources and whether these countries some sort of benefit in return for lining Trumps pockets.

House committees should also examine what appears from Inspector General reports and other sources to be an unprecedented number of ethics scandals in the Trump Cabinet including the conduct of Commerce Secretary , former EPA Administrator , former Interior Secretary , and others. , and have denied wrongdoing.

These are all vitally important investigations of possible corruption, and yet none of them is likely to result in a federal criminal case because pursuant to Supreme Court precedent, conflicts of interest are rarely criminal unless they meet the standard of quid pro quo bribery. This makes congressional attention to them even more crucial, which is why the recent news that the House Intelligence Committee is postponing the Cohen testimony and gearing up for a wide ranging conflicts investigation is a positive development indeed.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét