Chủ Nhật, 30 tháng 9, 2018

Auto news on Youtube Sep 30 2018

n the eve of pivotal testimony scheduled to take place Thursday before the Senate Judiciary

Committee that could determine whether Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh rises to the

high court, committee Republicans released word of a development that throws a new twist

on the already tortured proceedings.

And Democrats are screaming that their own trick has been pulled against them.

According to Fox News, Judiciary Committee Republicans released a statement late Wednesday

revealing that they had spoken with two men who have said it was possible that they were

actually responsible for an alleged sexual assault in the early 1980s that Palo Alto

University Professor Christine Blasey Ford is blaming on Kavanaugh.

According to Fox, the statement revealed that the GOP had been in contact with one of the

men since Monday.

The Republicans, led by committee Chairman Charles Grassley, obviously opted not to share

the information with Democratic colleagues.

In a statement to NBC News, an unnamed Democratic congressional aide was outraged.

"Twelve hours before the hearing they suggest two anonymous men claimed to have assaulted

her," the aide stated.

"Democrats were never informed of these assertions or interviews, in violation of

Senate rules."

Seriously?

This is the same party that kept quiet about a letter received by California Sen. Dianne

Feinstein in July but did not see fit to reveal its existence to the country until after Kavanaugh's

confirmation hearing had ended.

Sen Orrin Hatch, a Utah Republican, pointed out the hypocrisy in a Twitter post.

"Some might find it exceedingly difficult to imagine Judiciary Committee Democrats expressing

this complaint with straight faces," he wrote.

Some might find it exceedingly difficult to imagine Judiciary Committee Democrats expressing

this complaint with straight faces.

The bombshell news from Wednesday night was the latest development in a tumultuous week

that started when The New Yorker published an account of a second accuser against Kavanaugh

in a barely believable piece that was essentially built on a hazy memory, rumor — and Democratic

probes.

Then, publicity-hungry attorney Michael Avenatti went public on Wednesday with a tale of a

client with a bizarre story that Kavanaugh was part of a "gang rape" ring in the

early 1980s (Avenatti has publicly mused about mounting a 2020 presidential campaign, so

Democrat politics are clearly a factor).

Both accusations — like Ford's — were sprung out of the blue.

Now, Judiciary Committee Republicans have officially released word that there are yet

more stories out there that could put the whole thing to rest.

On Monday, the timeline recounts GOP staff members interviewing 'a man who believes

he, not Judge Kavanaugh, had the encounter with Dr. Ford in 1982.'

"The 'encounter' refers to an episode in which Ford claims that Kavanaugh sexually

assaulted her in a bedroom at a Maryland house party.

"They had a follow-up interview with that man, and he provided more detail about the

assault.

"Then on Wednesday, the committee staff said they spoke with a second man who said

he assaulted Ford in 1982."

No credible conservative has denied it was possible that Ford actually went through some

kind of ordeal in the early 1980s.

Kavanaugh himself said as much during an interview with Fox News on Monday.

I am not questioning and have not questioned that perhaps Dr. Ford at some point in her

life was sexually assaulted by someone in some place," he said, according to a transcript

from USA Today.

"But what I know is I have never sexually assaulted anyone in high school or at any

time in my life."

Obviously, it's too soon to tell where Wednesday's developments will lead, but it's possible

that they could eventually show Ford's story was correct to the extent that she actually

did go through an ordeal at the hands of a male.

It's also possible they will show, even to Democrats and rabid liberals, that Kavanaugh

is innocent of Ford's accusations.

But considering how they came out, and the Democrats' hypocritical reaction to them,

they prove one thing for sure:

For more infomation >> Grassley Borrows Trick from Dems, Unveils Game-Changer Hours Before Ford Appears - Duration: 4:09.

-------------------------------------------

Chris Wallace roasts Sarah Sanders: How can you call Dr. Ford 'compelling', still support Kavanaugh? - Duration: 4:04.

For more infomation >> Chris Wallace roasts Sarah Sanders: How can you call Dr. Ford 'compelling', still support Kavanaugh? - Duration: 4:04.

-------------------------------------------

Suspicious Note Left For "Dr. Ford" In Senate Hearing Room — Here's What It Said - Duration: 3:10.

Ahead of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford's testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday,

a suspicious note was left for the liberal professor in the hearing room.

Here's what the handwritten message said.

According to the New York Post, a mysterious, handwritten "good luck" note was left

for Christine Blasey Ford in the Senate Judiciary Committee's hearing room ahead of her Thursday

testimony.

"Good luck, Dr. Ford," read the note left Wednesday on the witness table where Ford

testified about her allegations of being sexually assaulted by Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh

in the 1980s.

Just hours until one of the most anticipated Senate hearings in decades, someone has left

a message for Christine Blasey Ford.

It's unknown who left a note that says, "Good luck, Dr. Ford," on the witness

table where the California professor will testify about accusations of sexual assault

against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh — who is also set to testify on Thursday.

A Roll Call photographer, checking out lighting and angles ahead of Thursday's 10 a.m. hearing,

noticed the notepad in the Senate Judiciary Committee's hearing room on Capitol Hill.

[Source: Roll Call] An aide initially told ABC News that committee

Chairman Chuck Grassley left the note — penned on Senate stationery — but his staffers

later said that was not true.

Indeed, it seems far more likely that the note was penned by one of the Democratic members,

as if to say, "Good luck, Dr. Ford.

You are our last hope at stopping the confirmation of President Donald Trump's Supreme Court

pick."

And, after all, that is what this has been about from the very beginning.

It has never been about getting to the truth.

It has always been about stopping Kavanaugh by any means necessary.

The Democrats knew Ford's story was impossible to prove from the getgo.

That's why Sen. Diane Feinstein held onto the professor's letter for six weeks before

making her accusations public on the eve of Kavanaugh's confirmation.

Feinstein had ample opportunity to confront Kavanaugh before then — the judge had participated

in 65 different meetings with Senators and sat for hours and hours of testimony, but

Feinstein never brought up Ford's allegations during any of those opportunities to address

them.

Yes, this has always been about stopping Kavanaugh's confirmation.

It was a political charade from the very beginning.

Without legitimate means of thwarting President Trump's Supreme Court pick, the Democrats

unleashed sexual assault claims they had held onto for weeks prior.

That, in and of itsef, is enough to prove that this is no more than political theatre.

Furthermore, the note left for Christine Blasey Ford in the Senate is a perfect example of

the difference in the way she has been treated, versus the way Judge Kavanaugh has been treated.

Was there a similar note wishing Kavanaugh "good luck" with his testimony?

Of course not.

There should have been, though.

After all, Kavanaugh is the one who stands to lose everything in this debacle.

Not Ford.

She has an army of people behind her who believe her story — even without a shred of evidence

— and who have crowd-funded hundreds of thousands of dollars for her "cause" — whatever

that is.

For more infomation >> Suspicious Note Left For "Dr. Ford" In Senate Hearing Room — Here's What It Said - Duration: 3:10.

-------------------------------------------

Dr. Ford's friend who Kavanaugh cited in his hearing just shot down his alibi in letter - Duration: 3:17.

For more infomation >> Dr. Ford's friend who Kavanaugh cited in his hearing just shot down his alibi in letter - Duration: 3:17.

-------------------------------------------

панель приборов Ford C-Max - Duration: 1:55.

For more infomation >> панель приборов Ford C-Max - Duration: 1:55.

-------------------------------------------

Hatch Sends Letter To The FBI Referencing 'Deeply Troubling' Behavior From Ford's Attorneys - Duration: 2:38.

Sen. Orrin Hatch, who has also publicly accused Democrats of doing everything possible to

slow down Judge Brett Kavanaugh's elevation to the Supreme Court, has sent the FBI a letter

demanding to know if they are faced with more stall tactics during its upcoming probe of

the allegations against Kavanaugh.

Hatch also spoke of the "deeply troubling" behavior of Debra Katz, an attorney for Kavanaugh

accuser Christine Blasey Ford.

After identifying that Ford and various alleged witnesses have agreed to cooperate, Hatch

said he was concerned that the investigation could be once again impeded.

"I am writing to request, however, that you notify the White House Counsel's Office

immediately if any witness(es) or their representatives seek to delay or are uncooperative in this

process," he said.

Hatch Stated that Katz's apparent conduct triggered his concerns.

"One key reason for my concern regarding possible delay comes from testimony during

the hearing this past Thursday.

According to Dr. Ford, she would have preferred to have been interviewed in California, away

from the spectacle of a public hearing.

But her lawyers apparently refused to convey to their client numerous offers by Senate

Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley to conduct a public or private interview in

a location of her choosing," Hatch wrote.

"The lawyers' refusal led directly to a public hearing, against Dr. Ford's express

wishes.

This is deeply troubling," he added.

See the full letter here.

though the probe is limited in duration, the FBI has been given full latitude to take the

investigation where it leads, Trump said Saturday.

"NBC News incorrectly reported (as usual) that I was limiting the FBI investigation

of Judge Kavanaugh, and witnesses, only to certain people.

Actually, I want them to interview whoever they deem appropriate, at their discretion.

Please correct your reporting!" Trump tweeted.

First reports suggested the FBI would investigate Ford's Claims only.

What are your thoughts?

Will there be more attempted delay tactics.

Let us know below?

For more infomation >> Hatch Sends Letter To The FBI Referencing 'Deeply Troubling' Behavior From Ford's Attorneys - Duration: 2:38.

-------------------------------------------

These Records Show Ford LIED About Being A Licensed Psychologist – HUGE Cover Up Underway - Duration: 5:38.

For more infomation >> These Records Show Ford LIED About Being A Licensed Psychologist – HUGE Cover Up Underway - Duration: 5:38.

-------------------------------------------

Ted Cruz Takes Christine Ford's Case Into The Courtroom And SHREDS It Into A Million Pieces(VIDEO)!! - Duration: 17:49.

Ted Cruz Takes Christine Ford's Case Into The Courtroom And SHREDS It Into A Million Pieces

Thank You mr. chairman

we're living in a divided time this country is divided right down the middle

there is an enormous amount of anger there's rage there's hatred we see

demonstrators screaming at each other

reflecting that rage reflecting that anger and I know there are great many

Americans who wish we could and believe we can get back to an environment where

we treat each other with civility and decency get back to an environment where

yes we have policy disagreements we disagree on what the right legislation

is to pass and we even have vigorous debates about what the right policy is

but we do so in a context that respects each other that doesn't demean the

humanity of each other that doesn't attack the character and drag people

through the mud the politics of personal destruction that we have seen on display

in recent days is Washington DC at it's very ugliest and all of us should

remember that we're talking about real human beings here these aren't pawns on

a chessboard these are real people dr. Ford has been through hell the last two

weeks I have no doubt have been extraordinarily painful for her for her

family the testimony she gave yesterday was powerful was clearly heart-wrenching

was clear she was hurting and hurting mightily having her name made public

against her wishes and dragged through the mud was a

hurtful thing to do it's the wrong thing to do and judge Kavanagh he too has been

dragged through the mud for the last two weeks in a way that has no precedence in

our polarized society we live in today it's almost tribe alized were half of us

we're one team's Jersey the other half we're the other team's Jersey and

everything we see we see through the lens of our Jersey so it would not

surprise me if across the country a

significant percentage of those on the Democratic side of the aisle saw

yesterday's testimony and concluded he must be guilty and it would not surprise

me if a very significant percentage of those on the Republican side of the

aisle saw yesterday's testimony the same testimony and concluded he must be

innocent one of the consequences of that you know Judge Cavanaugh talked about

how these smears and the many that had been leveled against him in the last two

weeks how they have as he put it destroyed his family some that may sound

like hyperbole I don't think it is Judge Cavanaugh has two young daughters a

ten-year-old and a 13 year old for the rest of their lives there is their

daughter's will go to school will interact with people many of whom are

convinced their father is a rapist I want you to think of the effect that

has when those are the allegations that's where it starts not I disagree

with your jurisprudence not I think you're wrong and how you interpret the

Constitution but you are I mean let's be clear he has been accused of among other

things participating in repeatedly drugging and gang raping women to take

some of the more sensational I think ludicrous claims that have been aired

these little girls are going to have classmates of theirs repeat those

charges to him some of the most poignant testimony yesterday when Judge Cavanaugh

described how he's taught law at Harvard Law School for over a decade and he said

he may never get to teach law again and that's entirely possible that's entirely

possible even if judge Cavanaugh has confirmed to the US Supreme Court as a

sitting justice in our polarized world I'm a graduate of the Harvard Law School

I think it is entirely possible those on the Left would say we don't want someone

we believe as a rapist ever teaching again he also talked about how much he

is loved coaching girls basketball coaching his daughters in basketball and

he mentioned he may never coach again

that's a very real possible consequence of the mudslinging and irresponsible

behavior of the last two weeks it may well be in this tribe alized partisan

divided world that the parents of the other girls say no we don't want him as

a coach anymore our words and actions have consequences that being said even

though this is a divided time even though this is a partisan time

I have faith in the American people I have faith in the American people that

we want to be fair minded we want to actually assess the facts we want to

actually assess what happens I think it's important that once these

allegations became public that dr. Ford was given a full and fair opportunity to

tell her story I emphatically urged my colleagues that was the right thing to

do to give her the opportunity to testify in public and that it was

important that when she testified she be given an environment that was fair that

was respectful that she not be too mean that she not be attacked and she wasn't

that was the right thing to do the committee once this had been forced to

the front pages of the paper the right thing to do was give her a public forum

and a full public forum to tell her story but the right thing also requires

and we saw yesterday judge Cavanaugh being given a full and fair opportunity

to defend himself

the American people watched that testimony and you come away with a

number of conclusions number one it is clear their testimony is in direct

conflict what they said is directly conflicting judge Cavanaugh

categorically and unequivocally denied the allegations

so the question is how do you resolve that discrepancy how does this committee

how does the United States Senate how do the American people resolve the

discrepancies when you have two witnesses that testify to things

diametrically opposed well the only way I know to do and this is how a court of

law operates this is how most reasonable people operate is when you have

conflicting testimony you look to well what is the rest of the evidence

demonstrate what other evidence is there and what does the evidence demonstrate

dr. Ford named three fact witnesses who she says were there and could

corroborate her story none of the three corroborates her story

not only did they not corroborate her story all three of the named fact

witnesses explicitly refuted her story and they did so under penalty of perjury

they didn't do so lightly they didn't just say it they did so in a context

that under the United States Code they can face up to five years in prison if

they lied to this committee so every single fact witness but dr. Ford named

has explicitly disputed her allegations now one of those fact witnesses was mr.

judge we've heard a lot of discussions about mr. judge a lot of my colleagues

saying why didn't we hear testimony for mr. judge

well mr. judge refused to talk to the committee he submitted a statement a

statement under penalty of perjury under penalty of felony but he refused to be

interviewed by investigators it's not complicated to understand why the public

record indicates mr. judge has had a very troubled life that he is battled

with addiction for most of his life we heard testimony yesterday that he's been

near death that he battles with depression that he's a cancer survivor

he has also been directly accused of multiple felonies so when committee

investigators asked to interview him he said no that shouldn't surprise anybody

we had a vote earlier today on subpoenaing mr. judge it's not

complicated what would happen if he were subpoenaed he came before this committee

any defense lawyer worth his salt would tell mr. judge not to testify

now I understand politically Democratic members of this Senate would very much

like to see a man who struggled with addiction most

of his life sitting before this committee and pleading the fifth that

would make great theatrics that would make great political theatrics it

wouldn't help one iota in the search for the for the truth but it would make a

great public show and I will say of the three fact witnesses the one who I think

is most revealing is Leland Kaiser MS Kaiser was close friends with dr. Ford

miss Kaiser had every incentive to back up her story and instead miss Kaiser

under penalty of perjury says she doesn't know judge Cavanaugh

and she has no recollection of any party like the one dr. Ford describes dr. Ford

testified yesterday that Miss Kaiser texted her after submitting that

statement to say she was sorry sorry for not backing up her story I think that

indicates powerfully that her incentives if at all possible were to back up the

story and yet she didn't feel she could she had no incentive no motive to lie

every incentive to agree with dr. Ford's story and yet she did not do so so all

three fact witnesses have explicitly disputed the allegations what other

evidence do we have we have judge Cavanaugh's calendars detailed day to

day I have to admit when the calendars were first released there were press

stories about them I didn't find that terribly persuasive evidence until Jeff

Cavanaugh walked through day by day each of the possible days when this was

alleged to have happened and walked through the specific conflicts how he

was out of town for many of the days how he had conflicts for many of the days

the notion that his calendars were almost like Diaries I frankly I think is

kind of odd that's not something many people do but it appears to be something

both he and his father do that contemporaneous evidence that he

kept in 1982 I'll tell you the court of law that kind of contemporaneous

evidence would be powerful if you're trying to ascertain two conflicting

witnesses and which one is telling the truth you would look for contemporaneous

evidence one way or the other and finally we know judge Cavanaugh's

impeccable record of decades of public service he's 53 years old and prior to

two weeks ago there have been no allegations whatsoever of this kind six

FBI background checks detailed thorough FBI background checks nobody raised any

claim like this now all of us know from human experience that if someone is a

sexual predator if someone is committing the kind of actions that have been

alleged that it is very rare that they're a one-time offender but if

someone is carrying out this kind of conduct they typically have a pattern of

doing so over and over and over again we have seen powerful men throughout

society and politics in journalism in Hollywood whose careers have rightly

been ended but they've been ended for a pattern of harassment of abuse that

typically extends decades because when someone behaves like this they behave

like this over and over again there's no credible indication that that's occurred

indeed it's striking that in his 12 years as a federal appellate judge a

majority of his law clerks have been women that is exceptionally unusual I do

not know of another federal appellate judge for whom that is the case and I

can tell you his law clerks revere him they hold him in the very highest of

respect his reputation judge Cavanaugh his reputation in this town

is it being a Boy Scout is it being a boring Boy Scout that's been his

reputation for a long time now some might say well gosh and the press there

been these other sensational allegations we've seen others that have popped up

after this one well I thought it was striking in yesterday's hearing that not

a single Democratic member of this committee chose to ask about any of the

other allegations I think that indicates how little credibility there is behind

those allegations what the one that is the most sensational by the client of

mr. avenatti makes extraordinary claims which apparently our Democratic

colleagues are embarrassed to say publicly because they demonstrate that

this has become a partisan circus this is not about substance this is about

smears can I ask the senator if he could sum up the reason I've done that is

because I'd like to give everybody a chance to speak this committee has given

dr. Ford and judge Cavanaugh a full and fair opportunity to lay out their views

and I will say unfortunately the conduct of our Democratic colleagues it's been

clear that this has been all about politics all about delaying this

confirmation until after the election hoping that they win the Senate in the

election and then keeping this Supreme Court seat vacant until 2021 every

Democratic member of this committee before the confirmation hearing started

said they opposed judge Cavanaugh before a single thing started and not only that

this allegation the ranking member of this committee had it in writing on July

30th if on July 30th that had been reported to the committee chairman this

committee has a process to investigate it a process to investigate it that is

confidential that the FBI could have participated in investigating starting

back in July 30th that we could have had a hearing

that is closed that is not dragging either of these individuals through the

mud that's the way this process should have worked

and the testimony yesterday from dr. Ford is that the only people who had

copies of the letter were herself her lawyers representative su and the

ranking member of this committee dr. Ford further testified that neither she

nor her lawyers handed the letter over that leaves the only conclusion possible

is that the letter was leaked to the public by either of the two Democratic

members of Congress or their staff or that or someone else to whom they gave

it if there are only four people that have it and two did not give it then the

other two are the only possible sources and that unfortunately demonstrates a

cynicism a willingness to smear dr. Ford if it helps politically delay this

nomination I think we have an obligation to be fair to be impartial to listen to

the evidence to weigh the evidence that's the right thing to do and that's

what I hope this committee does and that's what I hope the full Senate does

thank you god bless you and God bless america

For more infomation >> Ted Cruz Takes Christine Ford's Case Into The Courtroom And SHREDS It Into A Million Pieces(VIDEO)!! - Duration: 17:49.

-------------------------------------------

WATCH Under Fire Senator Feinstein Blames FORD For Leak To The Media(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 11:15.

WATCH Under Fire Senator Feinstein Blames FORD For Leak To The Media

third acrux Thank You mr. chairman judge Cavanaugh you and your family have

been treated incredibly poorly by Senate Democrats and by the media and let me

say also I think dr. Ford and her family had been treated incredibly poorly by

Senate Democrats in the media you have both seen your good names dragged

through the mud and this has been sadly one of the most shameful chapters in the

history of the United States Senate let me say to you and your family thank you

for a lifetime of public service I will say watching your mother's pained face

has been heart-wrenching as she's seen her son's character dragged through the

mud after not only your lifetime of public service but her lifetime of

public service as well and I know as a father there's been

nothing more painful to you than talking to your daughters and explaining these

attacks that the media is airing I also believe though that the American people

are fair-minded people that the American people can set aside the partisan

warfare of Washington and look to substance and facts and that is the

charge of this committee now there have been three different sets of allegations

that have dominated the media I think it's important to note that two of those

sets of allegations had so little corroboration that even the New York

Times which is no conservative outlet refused to report on them because they

could find no basis for them and it was striking in his entire hearing that not

a single Democrat in this committee asked about two sets of those

allegations mr. Ramirez's allegations and the allegations of the client of mr.

abinanti not a single Democrat I don't know if they were just to embarrass mr.

Evan Eddie's allegations were so scandalous that the ranking member of

MIT 'add his clients most scandalous accusations

of you as a criminal mastermind essentially omitted those scandalous

accusations from her statement this hearing has focused rightly so on the

allegations dr. Ford presented and let me say I think the committee did the

right thing in giving dr. Ford a full and fair opportunity to tell her story

that's what we needed to do when these allegations became public and the

committee treated her with respect as we should i do not believe senate democrats

have treated you with respect what do we know we know that her testimony and your

testimony are in conflict a fair-minded Assessor of facts would then look to

what else do we know when you have conflicting testimony well we know that

dr. Ford identified three fact witnesses who she said observed what occurred all

three of those fact witnesses have stated on the record under penalty of

perjury that they do not recall what she is alleging happening they have not only

not not corroborated her charges they have explicitly refuted her charges

that's significant to a fair-minded fact-finder in addition you walked

through before this committee your calendars from the time now I will say

you were a much more organized teenager than I was and that many of us were but

it was a compelling recitation of night by night by night where you were in the

summer of 1982 that is yet another contemporaneous piece of fact to assess

what happened and we also know that the Democrats on this committee engaged in a

profoundly unfair process the ranking member had these allegations on July

30th and for 60 days that was 60 days ago

the ranking member did not refer it to the FBI for an investigation the ranking

member did not refer it to the full committee for an investigation the

ranking member this committee could have investigated those claims in a

confidential way that respected dr. Ford's privacy and some of the most

significant testimony we heard this morning as dr. Ford told this committee

if the only people to whom she gave her letter were her attorneys the ranking

member and her member of Congress and she stated that she and her attorneys

did not release the letter which means the only people that could have released

that that letter were either the ranking member and her staff or the Democratic

member of Congress because dr. Ford told this committee those are the only people

who had it that is not a fair process and we should look to the facts not

anonymous innuendo and slander Sherman I asked for a point of personal privilege

to respond mercy mr. chairman let me be clear I did not hide

dr. Ford's allegations I did not leak her story she asked me to hold it

confidential and I kept it confidential as she asked she apparently was stalked

by the press felt that what happened she was forced to come forward and her

greatest fear were realized was realized she's been harassed she's had death

threats and she's had to flee her home in addition the investigation that the

Republican majority is heralding is really nothing that I know about other

than a partisan practice normally all the witnesses would be interviewed

however that's not happened while the majority has reached out to several

people they did not notify me or my staff that they were doing this and so

ought to argue that we would not participate but not tell us what they

were up to is somewhat disingenuous I was given some information by a woman

who was very much afraid who asked that it be

held confidential and I held it confidential until she decided that she

would come forward mr. chairman would would the ranking member

answer a question please if I can I I have great respect for senator Feinstein

we've worked together on many topics and I believe what you just said can you

tell us that your staff did not leak it oh I don't believe my staff would leak

it I have not asked that question directly but you do not owe you know

that I mean how in the world did that get in the hands of the of the press the

answer is no the staff have you ever asked you know have you asked your staff

or other staff - with the Judiciary Committee pardon me

well a Jennifers reminds me I've asked her before about it well so that's true

well somebody leaked it if it wasn't you well it was I'm telling you it was not I

did not I mean I was asked to keep it confidential and and I'm criticized for

that too mr. chairman could I ask the Chairman a question which is does the

committee have a process if there is an allegation against any nominee to assess

that allegation in a confidential forum rather than in the public dread since

dr. Ford requested that it be kept confidential is there a process for the

committee for considering confidential allegations and the answer is yes and I

said senator Tillis pointed out the document that I put out to show of all

the things that we've done along the lines of your question and mr. chairman

what would you have done if on July 30th the ranking member had had raised this

allegation with you has the chairman of this committee how would you would have

done like we have done with every background or let's say FBI report that

comes from the White House with the nominee and then subsequent to that

because maybe the FBI got done with the three months ago we go through the FBI

or information comes to us then we have our investigators in a bipartisan

both Republicans and Democrats follow up on though whatever those questions are

or those problems would have to be worked out

so bipartisan investigators could have investigated this two months ago and it

could have been heard in a confidential setting without dr. Ford's name or judge

Cavanaugh's name being dragged through the mud wrecked and except for one or

two conversations that we had with the judge to our investigators Democrats

didn't participate except in those two but in those two or one or two they

didn't ask any questions Thank You mr. chairman I want to would mr. chairman we

ought Matt man respond it's my understanding that her story was leaked

before the letter became public and she testified that she had spoken to her

friends about it and it's most likely that that's how the story leaked and

that she had been asked by press but it did not leak from us I assure you of

that almost mr. chairman I I'm a little

confused I thought only the member of the House and senator Feinstein and her

lawyers had the letter so her friends she might have talked to about it

couldn't leak the letter if they just had a book verbal conversation unless

she gave that my copy of the letter senator I don't think the letter was

ever late well how did the press know to contact her about her complaint she

apparently she testified here this morning that she had talked to friends

about it and the press had talked to her

senator our judge a sense there was reference to the problems the legitimate

problems and the and the change of lifestyle that dr. Ford had if you want

some time to say the impact on your family I'll be glad to hear you if you

don't want to talk about that's okay I've talked about that it's okay then

senator Harris thank you bless you and God bless america

For more infomation >> WATCH Under Fire Senator Feinstein Blames FORD For Leak To The Media(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 11:15.

-------------------------------------------

Kavanaugh Just Got Last Laugh On Ford's Massive GoFundMe 'Earnings' – Look Who's Cashing In! - Duration: 7:03.

For more infomation >> Kavanaugh Just Got Last Laugh On Ford's Massive GoFundMe 'Earnings' – Look Who's Cashing In! - Duration: 7:03.

-------------------------------------------

America Ferrera - Standing with Christine Blasey Ford & "American Like Me" | The Daily Show - Duration: 7:24.

-Welcome back to the show. -Thank you.

So good to have you here.

Um, there are so many things that you're working on,

and today's one of those crazy days

where I'm sure you're torn

between what's happening in the news,

what's happening in life.

Um, let's start with the news today.

-Mm. -I'm sure you were also watching what was happening,

um, in-in the Supreme Court nomination hearing.

You're somebody who's been involved avidly in politics.

-Mm. -Just from your point of view,

when you were watching what happened today,

what would you say was your visceral feeling?

Outrage. (laughs)

Um... I... first and foremost, uh...

love Dr. Ford for her heroic actions that she took.

Um, I believe Dr. Ford.

Um, and I watched,

as a survivor of sexual assault myself,

a very public display of what happens

-to survivors when they dare speak up. -Right.

And I can't imagine a more credible,

uh, composed woman,

uh, sitting in her position

and doing the amazing job that she did

to-to tell her truth and speak her voice.

And then to watch, um, a man-child sort of...

(laughter)

...blubber through his own testimony is enraging.

I'm so sick of seeing competent, intelligent,

credible women come up against men-children

and-and be suppressed.

It's-it's enraging, and it's...

And what happens tomorrow or tonight--

um, it's not just a vote.

It's a... it's a referendum on what we are as a country.

-Right. -What are we willing to accept?

Where are we really?

And how much longer are women's lives

and women's dignity going to come secondary

to the needs of powerful men?

(applause and cheering)

Wow.

The...

The story of America is...

so beautifully contained in this book.

And off what you were just saying now,

in many ways, for many people, it feels like America's

in a space of multiple referendums now.

You know, the midterms are coming up.

People are saying that's going to be a referendum on Trump.

Every single election feels like the people speaking out.

This book is really something different.

American Like Me: Reflections on Life Between Cultures.

You've collected a group of really amazing people--

everyone from Uzo Aduba to Lin-Manuel Miranda, Roxane Gay--

and you got people to write really personal accounts

of just who they are, what makes them who they are,

and how... being different

has helped them find who they are,

but also how it's excluded them from the world.

How did you even begin this journey,

and how did you get these people to write in the book?

Yeah. Um, well, you know, I... the more and more I think

about... our country,

the more I believe that this American experiment,

it's a storytelling experiment.

It's sort of whose story gets told.

You know, and who has control over which stories get told

and which stories get believed.

And... and, you know, for me,

I-I... I grew up feeling...

100% American.

-Right. -I mean, I could have bled red, white and blue

as a nine-year-old child.

I believed everything I had been taught,

that this is America, and in America

all you have to do is work hard and believe that you're equal

to everyone else, and that everyone else is equal to you,

-and nothing is impossible. -Right.

And I believed that.

And-and it wasn't until other people let me know

that I wasn't American like them

that... that my eyes were open to that.

-Right. -And-and...

and the space that I have inhabited for a lot of my life,

the place between feeling 100% American

but being told that others saw me not as that,

and then also feeling Latina

and-and deeply rooted to my family's culture and history,

um, but also being told that I really wasn't that either.

-Right. -So I sort of lived in a no-man's land.

And I felt so alone and isolated in that experience,

and when I realized that so many other people

felt that way, too, I-I...

I realized that it was because our stories never get told.

-Right. -We never see our experience

woven into the narrative of what this...

who is an American and what is an American.

And I have to say, I am so upset

that patriotism has been hijacked.

Because I am a patriot.

-I am an American. I love this country. -Right.

I have always loved this country.

-(applause) -And... and...

my story is American.

It's not "immigrant American."

-No, I am an American. -Right.

And-and, so I-- for me,

it was not just about telling my story,

but it was about inviting all these other

incredible activists and writers and athletes,

and people who have contributed

to the American culture in phenomenal ways,

who, um, who don't get to tell that part of their story.

And so I reached out to them and so many of them said yes,

which I was so honored by.

And now we have this gorgeous book

that a young person can hold in their hands and see

what it means to be reflected by Americans like them.

It really is a wonderful paradox to try and absorb,

because as you're reading through the stories,

on the one hand, you're absorbing a world

that has maybe told people repeatedly that they cannot be,

but you're also speaking to people

-who've managed to overcome that. -Mm-hmm.

And I guess the moral of the story that I took from the book,

is really that no one should have to face

that obstacle in the first place.

But it really is inspiring to see all of these stories,

to see all these people coming forward.

You are somebody who's done it in your life in multiple ways.

You know, you've gone from being America Ferrera,

people go like, "Oh, you're this type of actress,"

or "you're this type of person," or "this is what you mean."

And we've seen you just grow

and blow up in multiple different roles.

I mean, like, on Superstore now, you're directing.

You know, you're getting to direct episodes.

A new season is coming up.

Are we seeing more of you in these roles?

Are you gonna be exploring more of that?

Yeah. I mean, yes, absolutely.

I have started directing.

I'm directing this season as well.

I directed in the past two seasons.

You know, I think that so much of what this book

and these stories are about, and so much about where I am,

and where I think women and people of color,

and all kinds of marginalized people

in this country are feeling is we should be able

to walk into spaces as our whole selves.

We shouldn't have to strip away the pieces of us

that aren't accepted by the mainstream culture to exist

and be accepted in spaces.

And so, for me, that means I'm an actress,

that means I'm a director, that means I'm a producer,

that means I'm an engaged citizen.

And I get to be all of those things,

no matter what room I walk in to.

You're dream...

(cheers and applause)

...is carried through in the book.

We love watching you grow.

Congratulations on the new little one in your life.

-I appreciate you so much -Oh, thank you.

for being on the show again.

American Like Me is available now.

And the fourth season of Superstore

will premiere October 4 on NBC.

America Ferrera, everybody.

For more infomation >> America Ferrera - Standing with Christine Blasey Ford & "American Like Me" | The Daily Show - Duration: 7:24.

-------------------------------------------

Democrat Scandal Explodes On Ford Testimony Feinstein & Her Attorneys Played Her Violating ABA Rules - Duration: 11:49.

Democrat Scandal Explodes On Ford Testimony Feinstein & Her Attorneys Played Her Violating ABA Rules

in reading The Washington Post article it mentions that this incident that

we're here about contributed to anxiety and PTSD problems with which you have

struggled the word contributed does that mean that there are other things that

have happened that have also contributed to anxiety and PTSD I think that's a

great question I think the etiology of anxiety and PTSD is multifactorial so

that was certainly a critical risk risk that we would call it a risk factor in

science so that would be a predictor of the assumptions that I now have it

doesn't mean that other things that have happened in my life would have would

make it worse or better there are other risk factors as well so have there been

other things then that have contributed to the anxiety and PTSD that you

suffered well I think there's sort of biological predispositions that everyone

in here has four particular disorders so I can't rule out that I would have some

biological predisposition to be what about anxious type person what about

environmental environmentally not that I can think of

certainly note nothing as striking as that event okay may I ask dr. Ford how

did you get to Washington in a airplane okay it's I asked that because it's been

reported by the press that you would not submit to an interview with the

committee because of your fear of flying is that true well I was willing I was

hoping that they would come to me but then I realized that was an unrealistic

request it would have been a quicker trip for me yes so that was certainly

what I was hoping was to avoid having to get on an airplane but I eventually was

able to I get up the gumption with the help of

some friends and get on the plane when you were here in the mid-atlantic area

back in August end of July August how did you get here

also by airplane I come here once a year during this summer to visit my family ok

I'm sorry not here I go to Delaware ok in fact you fly fairly frequently for

your hobbies and your you've had to fly for your work is that true correct

unfortunately you you were a consulting by a statistician in Sydney Australia is

that right I've never been to Australia but the company that I worked for is

based in Australia and they have an office in San Francisco California

ok I don't think I'll make it to Australia it is long

I also saw on your CV that you list the following interest of surfing travel and

you in parentheses put Hawaii Costa Rica South Pacific Islands in French

Polynesia have you been all to those places correct by airplane yes and your

interests also include oceanography Hawaiian and Tahitian culture did you

travel by air as a part of those interests correct thank you for me to

travel going that direction when it's a vacation did you talk about your

allegations with any Republican member of Congress or congressional staff I did

not where I live the congresswoman is a Democrat ok was it communicated to you

by your counsel or someone else that the committee had asked to interview you and

that they offered to come out to California to do so we're gonna object

mr. chairman to any call for privileged conversations between counsel and dr.

Ford

what what could could we could you validate the fact that the offer was

made without her saying a word

is it possible for that question be answered without violating any console

relationships can I say that my teacher do you mind if I say something to you

directly you know um I just appreciate that you did offer that I wasn't clear

on what the offer was if you were gonna come out to see me I would have happily

hosted you and had to had been happy to speak with you out there I just did not

it wasn't clear to me that that was the case okay does that take care of your

question yes thank you mr. chary proceed then before July 30th the date on your

letter to senator Feinstein had you retained counsel with regard to these

allegations no I didn't think I didn't understand why I would need lawyers

actually I just didn't know a lot of people have that feeling okay let's talk

about the letter that you wrote on July 30th you asked senator Feinstein to main

confidentiality quote until she retreats it and just try to look for it okay so

it stopped the clock will you I found it

you asked senator Feinstein to maintain confidentiality until we have had

further opportunity to speak and then said you were available to speak further

vacationing in the mid-atlantic until August seventh is that correct

the last line is love - I'm now just catching up with you sorry I'm a little

slower my mind is getting a little tired I am available to speak further should

you wish to discuss him yes I was in Delaware until August seventh okay and

after that I went to New Hampshire and then back to California did you talk

with anybody about this letter before you sent it I talked with Anna s use

office okay and why did you talk to congresswoman issues office about that

letter because they were willing to hand deliver it to senator Feinstein okay did

anyone help you write the letter no okay after you sent your letter did you or

anyone on your behalf speak to senator Feinstein personally or with any Senate

staffer yes okay I had a phone call with senator Feinstein okay and when was that

that was while I was still in Delaware so before August 7th okay and how many

times did you speak with senator Feinstein once okay what did you talk

about as she asked me some questions about the incident and I answered those

questions okay was that the extent of the gist of the conversation yes it was

a fairly brief calm phone call okay did you ever give senator Feinstein or

anyone else the permission to release that letter not that I know of no

between the letter date July 30th and August the 7th did you speak with any

other person about your allegations could you say the dates again between

the letter date of July 30th and August 7th so while you were still in Delaware

did you speak with any other person about your allegations I'm just trying

to remember what dates that

stop - you're asking her with you I won't have any lawyers I've spoken with

correct correct correct I think correct then I I was interviewing lawyers but I

will not okay speaking personally about it aside from lawyers that you were

seeking to possibly hire to represent you did you speak to anybody else about

it during that period of time no okay I was staying with my parents at the

time did you talk to them about it definitely not okay so would it be fair

to say that you retained counsel during that time period of July 30th to August

7th I can't remember the exact date but it was the I was interviewing lawyers

during that period of time sitting in the car in the driveway and in the

Walgreens parking lot and we're hope it's Delia and trying to figure out how

the whole system works of interviewing lawyers and how to pick one etc so you

testified earlier that you had you didn't see the need for lawyers and now

you're trying to hire them what made you change your mind

it seems like most of the individuals that I had told which didn't that the

total number the total was not very high but those persons advised me to at this

point get a lawyer for advice about whether to push forward or to stay back

did that include congresswoman su and senator Feinstein no in we've heard this

morning several times that you did take a polygraph and that was on August 7th

is that right I believe so it's the day I was flying

from BWI to Manchester New Hampshire okay why did you decide to take a

polygraph I didn't see any reason not to do it were you advised to do that again

you're seeming to call for communications between counsel and

client I don't think you mean to do that if you do she

shouldn't have to answer that what console could you let her answer the

extent to which she doesn't violate the the relationship between you and dr.

Ford

based on the advice of the council it was happy to undergo the polygraph test

although I found it extremely stressful much longer than I anticipated I told my

whole life story I felt like I endured it I was fine I understand they can be

that way have you ever taken any other polygraphs

in your life never okay thank you god bless you and God bless america

For more infomation >> Democrat Scandal Explodes On Ford Testimony Feinstein & Her Attorneys Played Her Violating ABA Rules - Duration: 11:49.

-------------------------------------------

FORD TRANSİT İLE DAĞ YOLLARINDA GEZİNTİ •• ASSETTO CORSA - Duration: 26:56.

For more infomation >> FORD TRANSİT İLE DAĞ YOLLARINDA GEZİNTİ •• ASSETTO CORSA - Duration: 26:56.

-------------------------------------------

Weekend Update: Brett Kavanaugh and Dr. Ford Testify - SNL - Duration: 5:02.

For more infomation >> Weekend Update: Brett Kavanaugh and Dr. Ford Testify - SNL - Duration: 5:02.

-------------------------------------------

JUSTICE SERVED! Kavanaugh Vindicated – Dems And Dr.Ford Have Hell To Pay - Duration: 6:43.

After a heated and grueling full day of hearings, Thursday, from both Judge Kavanaugh and his

accuser, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, the Senate moved forward in favor of Kavanaugh that advances

him on to the final vote on the Senate floor.

If he gets approval there, from Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer and Republican Senator

Mitch McConnell, Kavanaugh will be confirmed as the next Supreme Court appointment.

The incredible turn of events comes after a decisive vote from Republican Jeff Flake

(Arizona), who made a last minute compromise with Democrats on an FBI investigation.

Flake said that he would vote in favor of Kavanaugh contingent on having an investigation

and a delay on the final vote to complete it.

Democrats believed they came out as the victors over nominee Kavanaugh, from Dr. Ford's

emotional testimony and fragile appearance.

The win for Kavanaugh is also a win for Republicans and Americans, but not for the left who were

desperate to keep him from the Supreme Court, including pulling out this sexual assault

allegation in the 11th hour.

Kavanaugh overcoming this step also sends a message to the left that their continual

tactic of sexual allegations is a transparent character assassination to gain control, since

they seemingly can not on merit and honesty.

Dr. Ford maintained her allegations against Kavanaugh, from 36 years ago, that it was

him who attacked her.

Other than political Democrats who supported her claim, friends, classmates, and associates

of both Ford and Kavanaugh did not corroborate her claim, as well as the subsequent two accusers'

claims.

As if we needed more reasons to doubt that the Democrat Party made up allegations against

Brett Kavanaugh here comes Julie Swetnick along with her lawyer Michael Avenatti, also

know as "The Creepy Porn Lawyer."

Young Conservatives is reporting that Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh was accused on Wednesday

by a third woman of engaging in sexual misconduct at parties while he was a student at Georgetown

Preparatory School during the 1980s.

The allegation came from 55-year-old Julie Swetnick, who like 53-year-old Judge Kavanaugh

grew up in the Washington suburbs.

In a statement posted on Twitter by her lawyer, Ms. Swetnick said she observed the future

Supreme Court nominee at parties where women were verbally abused, inappropriately touched,

made "disoriented" with alcohol or drugs and "gang raped."

She added that she witnessed 17-year-old Judge Kavanaugh participating in some of the misconduct.

Which included lining up outside a bedroom where "numerous boys" were "waiting

for their 'turn' with a girl inside the room."

60 people who grew up with Kavanaugh in that area are refuting the gang-rape claim.

They all signed a letter calling the Swetnick claims "nonsense."

Furthermore, they say they never met her or knew of her and these types of parties did

not go on there.

60 (!) men & women who attended Georgetown Prep or sister schools who knew Brett Kavanaugh

well sign letter calling the Swetnick claims "nonsense."

Say they do not know Swetnick, never met Swetnick, never say parties like this.

"It is reprehensible."

Here is more via The Chicago Tribune: "Swetnick's accusations against Kavanaugh

came a day before the Senate Judiciary Committee will hear from Christine Blasey Ford, the

California professor who said Kavanaugh assaulted her at a party when they were both teenagers.

A second woman, Deborah Ramirez, told the New Yorker magazine that Kavanaugh exposed

himself to her when they were both at Yale.

Kavanaugh has unequivocally denied both charges, as he did in response to Swetnick on Wednesday.

"According to her affidavit, Swetnick met Kavanaugh and his friend and Georgetown Prep

classmate Mark Judge in the early 1980s at house parties.

She alleges that the teens who attended tried getting girls drunk "so they could then

be 'gang-raped' in a side room or bedroom by a 'train' of numerous boys," she

wrote.

"I have a firm recollection of seeing boys lined up outside rooms at many of these parties

waiting for their 'turn' with a girl inside the room.

These boys included Mark Judge

and

Brett Kavanaugh."

For more infomation >> JUSTICE SERVED! Kavanaugh Vindicated – Dems And Dr.Ford Have Hell To Pay - Duration: 6:43.

-------------------------------------------

The Gaslighting of Christine Blasey Ford (What is Gaslighting Explained/Examples) - Duration: 10:17.

I've been furious for most of the week watching what's happening to Christine

blase Ford first Brett Kavanaugh and we need to talk about this mental health

subject what's up everybody this is Chris from the rewired salt where we

talk about the problem but focus on the solution and if you're new to my channel

my channel is all about mental health something I try to do is decrease the

stigma increase awareness and oh my god am I trying to increase awareness now

one of the reasons that I'm making this video is because so many people do not

understand mental illness they don't understand neuroscience and it's

absolutely mind-boggling anyways that kind of stuff make sure you

subscribe and win that notification bell but anyways like this is blowing my mind

like I unfortunately or fortunately depending on how you look at it I know

so many women who have been the victims of trauma okay

and and watching this thing I've seen my friends posting about it and stuff and

how it's like bringing up memories and things like that and watching what's

happening - Christine blase Ford is absolutely disgusting like okay those of

you have been following my channel like I am a big neuroscience node I loved

neuroscience I loved learning how the brain works like the fact that you have

people making decisions and questioning this woman who have absolutely no

understanding how the human brain works is mind blowing

it is mind blowing like okay so first let's talk about the gaps laughing

that's happening so gasps reading for those of you who don't know what it is

gas lighting is when you make somebody question their own sanity okay a lot of

narcissists will do this to their significant others or people around them

and like seeing what's happening - Christine velocity forward like oh my

god and all these news reports that saying like well maybe it was somebody

else maybe she doesn't remember maybe she's just this and it's like are you

kidding me because then on the same side on the same side of that argument you

see people saying well why didn't she come forward sooner why did she wait

that long hello hi do you not understand why women

don't come forward because they're about to face this kind of scrutiny saying oh

well maybe you don't remember it correctly maybe this didn't really

happen and it's insane you know what thinking about this I remember watching

the comments and one of my 13 reasons why videos right and people were upset

with the main character because she didn't get for help after she was

sexually assaulted but she did go for help and the same thing happened when

she went to see a high school counselor he questioned her memory he questioned

whether or not she remembered properly and did this really happen or was it

consensual like it's crazy this is why so many sexual assault victims are not

coming forward and this isn't just in the Christina Blasi Ford case I know

countless women who have tried to speak up about these things and it gets

questioned like oh maybe it didn't happen

I know these are serious allegations I'm a fool to think that nobody in the

history of something like this but oh my god like when it comes down to the

memory and how the brain works like I might include a clip right here

christina blase floored for talking about how the brain actually works like

she dropped the mic so hard on these fools like how can you really trust your

memory and she laid it down perfectly you are very clear about the attack that

it was Brett Kavanaugh that covered your mouth to prevent you from screaming how

are you so sure that it was he the same way that I'm sure that I'm talking to

you right now is just basic memory functions also just the level of

norepinephrine and epinephrine in the brain that sort of as you know encodes

that neurotransmitter encodes memories into the hippocampus and so the trauma

related experience then is kind of locked there whereas other details kind

of drift so let's talk about the brain science of this stuff real quick trauma

burns in your memory like a brand okay because your brain the strongest part of

your brain is the limbic system the limbic system is responsible for fight

flight freeze it's also responsible for your memories okay traumatic events get

burned in your memory because your brain wants to protect you from that happening

again so when a traumatic event happened what happens is your brain locks that

into the memory but your brain is very efficient okay so it locks in the main

things okay typically sensory this is why when people get triggered it give me

sights sounds smells tastes all sorts of things like certain smells can trigger

somebody based on something that was in the room the time of this happening this

is why when you see War veterans who struggle with PTSD loud noises might

trigger them because even though they don't have to witness a horrendous act

happening in front of them the noise might happen because the brain is saying

yo this crazy thing might be happening again so you need to get on the defense

and you need to save your life so Christine pelisek Thord explained this

because she's actually a doctor and understands this stuff and how it birds

into the memory of the hippocampus so that's why she remembers those

particular details and like she mentions and talks about is with so many other

women struggle with is that it is it her relationships and she went to college

and later on in life and her and her husband went to couples counseling and

that's again where this came up but it just blows my mind that that people

would think that people would think that this woman would go under so much

scrutiny and all this stuff for some kind of political reasons like think

about in your right mind like I am NOT here I'm not a political channel or

anything like that I'm very passionate about mental health and advocacy that's

what my channel is about I try to leave my political opinions outside of here

but this is absolutely bananas but we could really talk about this with any

case with any case of sexual assault and things like that not all of them end up

like this but I just want people to understand

and that this is why more women don't come forward this is why people don't

come forward and it's like you know as a father as a father like I just hope and

pray that my son feels comfortable enough to talk to me if anything like

this ever happens like watching the Ford's testimony was brutal I don't know

how many of you watched it but I was at the gym and I was watching it and how

many times she was asked to recount the details of this and explain and go

through it like that is so difficult for anybody like I talked about some of the

traumatic things that happen in my past and they're nowhere near what have

happened to most victims out and around the world so the fact that she's willing

to come forward and do this I hope what I hope it does is it's kind of like with

mental health like I hope it inspires more people to come out and share their

stories and talk about them and everything like that like I am a firm

believer and due process I think the last thing I'll say in this rant video

is I think it's ridiculous that we don't hold somebody with a lifetime term as a

Supreme Court justice to the same standards as anybody else who would go

through the criminal justice system like they're trying to knock this thing out

in like a week like people were like giving her crap like oh why don't you

fly out here oh oh hold on there's more to this man they were trying to

discredit her anxiety by bringing up the fact that she gets anxiety when she

flies so I don't know if you saw that part of the thing but they were

questioning or like well don't you fly for work don't you fight for this I'm

like really really you're trying to discredit her about this sexual assault

by talking about her her anxiety by flying like how many people on that

planet on that panel actually know a damn thing about mental health

neuroscience anxiety PTSD or anything like that and these are the people

making laws like it's no wonder it's no wonder while why mental health treatment

is so vastly underfunded in this country like look at the way they think it works

you know what I mean but yeah part of my channel is advocacy

so I talk about this stuff but anyways my girlfriend had me watch

this awesome video on Fox I'm actually gonna link it down below basically talks

more in depth about why certain memories you know might not be you know as vivid

as other ones and things like that like for example he brings up a very good

point like about five minutes into the video he's like you want to test it I

showed you a clip of the beginning of this video what were they wearing what

were the names of these people wait you know what I mean

so I don't know it's very interesting check it out I'll be in the description

if you have any thoughts comments concerns make sure you leave them down

in the comments below you know like I have noticed that I have a very large

female audience on here and like I really hope I can make videos that can

help you inspire you and things like that and talk with each other like I am

just a guy here talking trying to be a voice I'm not trying to white knight or

anything like that it's just I don't know I have compassion for people as a

whole and it just absolutely sickens me when I see this type of stuff happening

to anybody out there in the world so anyways that's all I got for this video

if you like this video give it a thumbs up if you're new subscribe bring the

notification about I make a ton of videos I was actually gonna make a video

about why you date who you dates but this made me very passionate so I made

this video first so make sure you subscribe bring the notification Bell

because that video should be coming tomorrow alright I love you all stay

safe I'll see you next time

For more infomation >> The Gaslighting of Christine Blasey Ford (What is Gaslighting Explained/Examples) - Duration: 10:17.

-------------------------------------------

Democrat Sheila Jackson Lee Caught On Live Video Secretly Handing Envelope To Ford's Lawyer - Duration: 5:09.

Now, this is very, very odd!

Chicks On The Right reported that during this morning's twisted testimony from the Democrat

Party's newest darling Christine Blasey Ford something was caught on video that has

the nation up in arms.

And it's not the actual testimony.

It's something that happened in the background.

Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee, who is not even a senator and has no business being at

the hearings, can be clearly seen handing Ford's attorney an envelope.

An envelope which he quickly acknowledges and conceals in his jacket pocket.

Now let me ask you.

Why is a sitting Congresswoman even talking to this woman's attorney let alone handing

him an envelope?

And what could be in that envelope?

Instructions, a thank you letter, and an autographed picture, or maybe what sounds more probable…

money?

We can only guess at this point and I am sure with a timid bunch as the Republicans are

we would not know anytime soon.

According to the Congresswoman's press office, the envelope was simply unopened stationery

notes given to counsel for Dr. Ford from women who wanted to enter the hearing room but were

not allowed to enter.

Why do I find this explanation so hard to believe?

Here is a reminder of who Sheila Jackson Lee really is via Legal Insurrection:

"A woman named Jean Marie Simon was scheduled to take a United Airlines flight, booked into

First Class using miles.

"Then she realized that United had bumped her from the seat, and given it to Texas Rep.

Sheila Jackson Lee."

The reactions of both United and Jackson Lee were sadly predictable.

"United blamed the passenger, in a convoluted claim that the passenger had canceled the

seat from her mobile phone app and then immediately re-booked.

The passenger rejected that claim, as the Houston Chronicle reports:

"After thoroughly examining our electronic records, we found that upon receiving a notification

that Flight 788 was delayed due to weather, the customer appears to have canceled her

flight from Houston to Washington, D.C. within the United mobile app," United said in a

statement.

"As part of the normal pre-boarding process, gate agents began clearing standby and upgrade

customers, including the first customer on the waitlist for an upgrade."

"Simon denies that she canceled her ticket.

She sent a reporter a screenshot of the United website showing only one "inactive" reservation

– a flight to Houston in August to visit her daughter that she had to cancel because

of Hurricane Harvey.

"A United official said screenshot does not show the December flight as canceled because

she ultimately took the flight….

"She said the plane took off at 12:50 p.m. and she arrived home that night, still upset.

Simon wrote a letter to airline's CEO and posted it on Facebook and Twitter.

A "resolution manager" called her Saturday morning and apologized at least a half-dozen

times, she said.

She said she wants a formal, written apology from United.

"It's just impossible to suspend disbelief and swallow that story that I canceled my

flight," Simon said.

"United has suffered a string of customer relations gaffes this year.

"In June, a woman said she was forced to give up her 2-year-old's $969 seat on a

flight from Houston to Boston and hold him for roughly three hours because the airline

sold the seat.

"In April, Dr. David Dao was forcibly removed from a United Express flight in Chicago to

make space for crew members headed to Louisville, Ky.

"The airline announced policy changes after that incident and its CEO, Oscar Munoz, has

promised a "culture shift toward becoming a better, more customer-focused airline."

"Jackson Lee did not see this as a mere dispute, issuing a statement that the woman

complaining was racist: "Since this was not any fault of mine, the

way the individual continued to act appeared to be, upon reflection, because I was an African

American woman, seemingly an easy target along with the African American flight attendant

who was very, very nice," Jackson Lee said in the statement.

"This saddens me, especially at this time of year given all of the things we have to

work on to help people.

But in the spirit of this season and out of the sincerity of my heart, if it is perceived

that I had anything to do with this, I am kind enough to simply say sorry.

"Pathetic."

Sheila Jackson Lee is not an upstanding citizen.

In fact, she is far

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét