Auto blog on youtube: Auto news on Youtube Sep 30 2018

Ahead of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford's testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday,

a suspicious note was left for the liberal professor in the hearing room.

Here's what the handwritten message said.

According to the New York Post, a mysterious, handwritten "good luck" note was left

for Christine Blasey Ford in the Senate Judiciary Committee's hearing room ahead of her Thursday

testimony.

"Good luck, Dr. Ford," read the note left Wednesday on the witness table where Ford

testified about her allegations of being sexually assaulted by Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh

in the 1980s.

Just hours until one of the most anticipated Senate hearings in decades, someone has left

a message for Christine Blasey Ford.

It's unknown who left a note that says, "Good luck, Dr. Ford," on the witness

table where the California professor will testify about accusations of sexual assault

against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh — who is also set to testify on Thursday.

A Roll Call photographer, checking out lighting and angles ahead of Thursday's 10 a.m. hearing,

noticed the notepad in the Senate Judiciary Committee's hearing room on Capitol Hill.

[Source: Roll Call] An aide initially told ABC News that committee

Chairman Chuck Grassley left the note — penned on Senate stationery — but his staffers

later said that was not true.

Indeed, it seems far more likely that the note was penned by one of the Democratic members,

as if to say, "Good luck, Dr. Ford.

You are our last hope at stopping the confirmation of President Donald Trump's Supreme Court

pick."

And, after all, that is what this has been about from the very beginning.

It has never been about getting to the truth.

It has always been about stopping Kavanaugh by any means necessary.

The Democrats knew Ford's story was impossible to prove from the getgo.

That's why Sen. Diane Feinstein held onto the professor's letter for six weeks before

making her accusations public on the eve of Kavanaugh's confirmation.

Feinstein had ample opportunity to confront Kavanaugh before then — the judge had participated

in 65 different meetings with Senators and sat for hours and hours of testimony, but

Feinstein never brought up Ford's allegations during any of those opportunities to address

them.

Yes, this has always been about stopping Kavanaugh's confirmation.

It was a political charade from the very beginning.

Without legitimate means of thwarting President Trump's Supreme Court pick, the Democrats

unleashed sexual assault claims they had held onto for weeks prior.

That, in and of itsef, is enough to prove that this is no more than political theatre.

Furthermore, the note left for Christine Blasey Ford in the Senate is a perfect example of

the difference in the way she has been treated, versus the way Judge Kavanaugh has been treated.

Was there a similar note wishing Kavanaugh "good luck" with his testimony?

Of course not.

There should have been, though.

After all, Kavanaugh is the one who stands to lose everything in this debacle.

Not Ford.

She has an army of people behind her who believe her story — even without a shred of evidence

— and who have crowd-funded hundreds of thousands of dollars for her "cause" — whatever

that is.

For more infomation >> Suspicious Note Left For "Dr. Ford" In Senate Hearing Room — Here's What It Said - Duration: 3:10.

-------------------------------------------

Dr. Ford's friend who Kavanaugh cited in his hearing just shot down his alibi in letter - Duration: 3:17.

For more infomation >> Dr. Ford's friend who Kavanaugh cited in his hearing just shot down his alibi in letter - Duration: 3:17.

-------------------------------------------

This Tweet Exposed Kavanaugh's Accuser's Biggest Lie - Duration: 3:21.

Christine Blasey Ford finally told her story under oath.

No one could believe what she said.

And this one tweet exposed her biggest mistake.

Christine Blasey Ford Gives Conflicting Testimony Ford claimed she could not immediately testify

because she was afraid of flying.

She said she needed time to drive cross-country from California to Washington, D.C.

Trump supporters suspected she was not telling the truth.

They believed she was stalling for time.

This delay allowed two other women to make more baseless allegations against Kavanaugh.

Both women's stories were so full of holes that the New York Times would not print them.

And after yesterday's testimony, Republicans suspicions were proven correct by Ford herself.

She admitted her fear of flying was suspect.

Rachel Mitchell, the outside prosecutor hired by Republicans to question Ford, asked her

how she got to Washington.

"I was hoping … to avoid having to get on an airplane," Ford responded.

"But I eventually was able to get up the gumption with the help of some friends and

get on the plane."

Mitchell asked, "When you were here in the Mid-Atlantic area back in August, end of July,

August, how did you get here?"

"Also by airplane," Ford answered.

Mitchell noted that Ford likes to surf and has listed "Hawaii, Costa Rica, South Pacific

Islands, and French Polynesia" as prime surfing locations.

"Have you been to all of those places?"

Mitchell asked.

Ford said she had and that she traveled by plane to all of them.

Ford Has Major Credibility Issues Ford lying about not being able to fly in

for the committee hearing was just one of her major credibility issues.

Donald Trump, Jr. noted that Ford developed a very convenient fear of flying.

Donald Trump, Jr. tweeted: "I'M NO PSYCHOLOGY PROFESSOR BUT IT DOES

SEEM WEIRD TO ME THAT SOMEONE COULD HAVE A SELECTIVE FEAR OF FLYING.

CAN NOT DO IT TO TESTIFY BUT FOR VACATION, WELL IT'S NOT A PROBLEM AT ALL."

Conservatives pointed out other issues with Ford's testimony.

Mollie Hemmingway of The Federalist tweeted: "SOME PEOPLE MAY FIND BLASEY FORD CREDIBLE.

OTHERS WILL NOT.

THAT'S WHY EVIDENCE, AND NOT SUBJECTIVE EMOTIONS, IS THE MEASURE TO USE TO SEEK JUSTICE.

FORD CAME AND LEFT THE HEARING WITH NO CORROBORATION.

TODAY ALSO REVEALED SOME TROUBLING INCONSISTENCIES."

Ford's testimony was emotional.

But it lacked substance, and most importantly, evidence.

She offered no corroboration for her claims.

And there were troubling contradictions.

The Washington Post reported her story based on the fact that they had reviewed her therapist's

notes from a 2012 counseling session.

However, Ford would not say if the Post actually saw her notes.

In addition, she could not give a straight answer as to how many people were at the party

where she claimed Kavanaugh tried to rape her.

Trump supporters went into the hearing believing the Democrats were exploiting Ford's claim

for political gain.

Ford's inability to deliver a credible testimony only further proved that theory.

We will keep you up to date on all new developments in this ongoing story.

For more infomation >> This Tweet Exposed Kavanaugh's Accuser's Biggest Lie - Duration: 3:21.

-------------------------------------------

панель приборов Ford C-Max - Duration: 1:55.

For more infomation >> панель приборов Ford C-Max - Duration: 1:55.

-------------------------------------------

After Using Her, Feinstein Actually Threw Ford Under the Bus with Jaw-Dropping Accusation - Duration: 4:44.

If you had the stout constitution to sit through every moment of the Kavanaugh/Ford hearings

Thursday, I am both envious and curious.

The envy stems from the fact that you could watch a room of craven politicians preen for

the camera and donor-email clips and not lose interest.

The curiosity stems from the fact that I get paid to do it, while most of our readership

does not.

If you waited until the end, however, you got to glimpse the guiding spirit of the whole

affair — or what a certain anonymous Op-Ed writer might have called the "lodestar"

that directed the proceedings — in a line from Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the ranking Democrat

on the Senate Judiciary Committee.

After being accused of leaking the letter that set this whole thing rolling, the California

senator denied either she or her staff released it.

Instead, she blamed the leak on a woman who was now utterly disposable to her — Christine

Blasey Ford.

The exchange began after Texas GOP Sen. Ted Cruz questioned the leaking of the letter,

which had been passed on to Sen. Feinstein.

"We also know that the Democrats on this committee engaged in a profoundly unfair process,"

Cruz said.

The ranking member had these allegations on July 30th and for sixty days, that was sixty

days ago, the ranking member did not refer it to the FBI for investigation, the ranking

member did not refer it to the full committee for an investigation.

"This committee could have investigated those claims in a confidential way that respected

Dr. Ford's privacy," Cruz continued.

"Dr. Ford told this committee that the only people to whom she gave her letter, were her

attorneys, the ranking member, and her member of Congress.

"And she stated that she and her attorneys did not release the letter, which means the

only people who could have released the letter were either the ranking member (Sen. Feinstein)

and her staff, or the Democratic member of Congress, because Dr. Ford told this committee

those are the only people who had it.

"That is not a fair process," Cruz said.

There were two options for Sen. Feinstein in this situation: a) apologize or b) deny.

If she chose option b), however, there was not the obligation to take path c): throw

Christine Blasey Ford under an entire Greyhound station of buses.

That's what she decided to do, however.

Mr. Chairman, let me be clear, I did not hide Dr. Ford's allegations.

I did not leak her story, she asked me to keep it confidential and I kept if confidential

as she asked," Feinstein said in response.

"She apparently was stalked by the press, felt that what happened, she was forced to

come forward, and her greatest fear was realized," Feinstein continued.

"She's been harassed, she's had death threats, and she's had to flee her home."

After blaming the Republicans for their investigation, which she called "a partisan practice,"

she continued to talk up the possible imperilment Ford was in.

"I was given some information by a woman who was very much afraid, who asked that it

be held confidential, and I held it confidential until she decided that she would come forward,"

Feinstein said.

She was then asked if her staff had leaked the letter by Sen. John Cornyn, another Texas

Republican.

"I have not asked that question directly, but I do not believe — the answer is no,"

Feinstein responded.

"The staff, they did not."

"Well, somebody leaked it if was not you," Cornyn said.

"I did not, I was asked to keep it confidential, and I am criticized for that too!" she said.

"It's my understanding that her story was leaked before the letter became public,

and she testified that she had spoken to her friends about it and it's most likely that

that's how the story leaked, and she had been asked by press.

"But it did not leak from us," Feinstein concluded.

"I assure you of that."

Yes, the letter leaked because this woman, who thought she was in grave jeopardy, leaked

the whole thing to the press by telling her friends, who were willing to put her in that

grave jeopardy by passing it on.

It had nothing — nothing — to do with the Democrats who would have benefited most

from this and would have had the motivation to pass

it on.

Right.

For more infomation >> After Using Her, Feinstein Actually Threw Ford Under the Bus with Jaw-Dropping Accusation - Duration: 4:44.

-------------------------------------------

Ted Cruz Takes Christine Ford's Case Into The Courtroom And SHREDS It Into A Million Pieces(VIDEO)!! - Duration: 17:49.

Ted Cruz Takes Christine Ford's Case Into The Courtroom And SHREDS It Into A Million Pieces

Thank You mr. chairman

we're living in a divided time this country is divided right down the middle

there is an enormous amount of anger there's rage there's hatred we see

demonstrators screaming at each other

reflecting that rage reflecting that anger and I know there are great many

Americans who wish we could and believe we can get back to an environment where

we treat each other with civility and decency get back to an environment where

yes we have policy disagreements we disagree on what the right legislation

is to pass and we even have vigorous debates about what the right policy is

but we do so in a context that respects each other that doesn't demean the

humanity of each other that doesn't attack the character and drag people

through the mud the politics of personal destruction that we have seen on display

in recent days is Washington DC at it's very ugliest and all of us should

remember that we're talking about real human beings here these aren't pawns on

a chessboard these are real people dr. Ford has been through hell the last two

weeks I have no doubt have been extraordinarily painful for her for her

family the testimony she gave yesterday was powerful was clearly heart-wrenching

was clear she was hurting and hurting mightily having her name made public

against her wishes and dragged through the mud was a

hurtful thing to do it's the wrong thing to do and judge Kavanagh he too has been

dragged through the mud for the last two weeks in a way that has no precedence in

our polarized society we live in today it's almost tribe alized were half of us

we're one team's Jersey the other half we're the other team's Jersey and

everything we see we see through the lens of our Jersey so it would not

surprise me if across the country a

significant percentage of those on the Democratic side of the aisle saw

yesterday's testimony and concluded he must be guilty and it would not surprise

me if a very significant percentage of those on the Republican side of the

aisle saw yesterday's testimony the same testimony and concluded he must be

innocent one of the consequences of that you know Judge Cavanaugh talked about

how these smears and the many that had been leveled against him in the last two

weeks how they have as he put it destroyed his family some that may sound

like hyperbole I don't think it is Judge Cavanaugh has two young daughters a

ten-year-old and a 13 year old for the rest of their lives there is their

daughter's will go to school will interact with people many of whom are

convinced their father is a rapist I want you to think of the effect that

has when those are the allegations that's where it starts not I disagree

with your jurisprudence not I think you're wrong and how you interpret the

Constitution but you are I mean let's be clear he has been accused of among other

things participating in repeatedly drugging and gang raping women to take

some of the more sensational I think ludicrous claims that have been aired

these little girls are going to have classmates of theirs repeat those

charges to him some of the most poignant testimony yesterday when Judge Cavanaugh

described how he's taught law at Harvard Law School for over a decade and he said

he may never get to teach law again and that's entirely possible that's entirely

possible even if judge Cavanaugh has confirmed to the US Supreme Court as a

sitting justice in our polarized world I'm a graduate of the Harvard Law School

I think it is entirely possible those on the Left would say we don't want someone

we believe as a rapist ever teaching again he also talked about how much he

is loved coaching girls basketball coaching his daughters in basketball and

he mentioned he may never coach again

that's a very real possible consequence of the mudslinging and irresponsible

behavior of the last two weeks it may well be in this tribe alized partisan

divided world that the parents of the other girls say no we don't want him as

a coach anymore our words and actions have consequences that being said even

though this is a divided time even though this is a partisan time

I have faith in the American people I have faith in the American people that

we want to be fair minded we want to actually assess the facts we want to

actually assess what happens I think it's important that once these

allegations became public that dr. Ford was given a full and fair opportunity to

tell her story I emphatically urged my colleagues that was the right thing to

do to give her the opportunity to testify in public and that it was

important that when she testified she be given an environment that was fair that

was respectful that she not be too mean that she not be attacked and she wasn't

that was the right thing to do the committee once this had been forced to

the front pages of the paper the right thing to do was give her a public forum

and a full public forum to tell her story but the right thing also requires

and we saw yesterday judge Cavanaugh being given a full and fair opportunity

to defend himself

the American people watched that testimony and you come away with a

number of conclusions number one it is clear their testimony is in direct

conflict what they said is directly conflicting judge Cavanaugh

categorically and unequivocally denied the allegations

so the question is how do you resolve that discrepancy how does this committee

how does the United States Senate how do the American people resolve the

discrepancies when you have two witnesses that testify to things

diametrically opposed well the only way I know to do and this is how a court of

law operates this is how most reasonable people operate is when you have

conflicting testimony you look to well what is the rest of the evidence

demonstrate what other evidence is there and what does the evidence demonstrate

dr. Ford named three fact witnesses who she says were there and could

corroborate her story none of the three corroborates her story

not only did they not corroborate her story all three of the named fact

witnesses explicitly refuted her story and they did so under penalty of perjury

they didn't do so lightly they didn't just say it they did so in a context

that under the United States Code they can face up to five years in prison if

they lied to this committee so every single fact witness but dr. Ford named

has explicitly disputed her allegations now one of those fact witnesses was mr.

judge we've heard a lot of discussions about mr. judge a lot of my colleagues

saying why didn't we hear testimony for mr. judge

well mr. judge refused to talk to the committee he submitted a statement a

statement under penalty of perjury under penalty of felony but he refused to be

interviewed by investigators it's not complicated to understand why the public

record indicates mr. judge has had a very troubled life that he is battled

with addiction for most of his life we heard testimony yesterday that he's been

near death that he battles with depression that he's a cancer survivor

he has also been directly accused of multiple felonies so when committee

investigators asked to interview him he said no that shouldn't surprise anybody

we had a vote earlier today on subpoenaing mr. judge it's not

complicated what would happen if he were subpoenaed he came before this committee

any defense lawyer worth his salt would tell mr. judge not to testify

now I understand politically Democratic members of this Senate would very much

like to see a man who struggled with addiction most

of his life sitting before this committee and pleading the fifth that

would make great theatrics that would make great political theatrics it

wouldn't help one iota in the search for the for the truth but it would make a

great public show and I will say of the three fact witnesses the one who I think

is most revealing is Leland Kaiser MS Kaiser was close friends with dr. Ford

miss Kaiser had every incentive to back up her story and instead miss Kaiser

under penalty of perjury says she doesn't know judge Cavanaugh

and she has no recollection of any party like the one dr. Ford describes dr. Ford

testified yesterday that Miss Kaiser texted her after submitting that

statement to say she was sorry sorry for not backing up her story I think that

indicates powerfully that her incentives if at all possible were to back up the

story and yet she didn't feel she could she had no incentive no motive to lie

every incentive to agree with dr. Ford's story and yet she did not do so so all

three fact witnesses have explicitly disputed the allegations what other

evidence do we have we have judge Cavanaugh's calendars detailed day to

day I have to admit when the calendars were first released there were press

stories about them I didn't find that terribly persuasive evidence until Jeff

Cavanaugh walked through day by day each of the possible days when this was

alleged to have happened and walked through the specific conflicts how he

was out of town for many of the days how he had conflicts for many of the days

the notion that his calendars were almost like Diaries I frankly I think is

kind of odd that's not something many people do but it appears to be something

both he and his father do that contemporaneous evidence that he

kept in 1982 I'll tell you the court of law that kind of contemporaneous

evidence would be powerful if you're trying to ascertain two conflicting

witnesses and which one is telling the truth you would look for contemporaneous

evidence one way or the other and finally we know judge Cavanaugh's

impeccable record of decades of public service he's 53 years old and prior to

two weeks ago there have been no allegations whatsoever of this kind six

FBI background checks detailed thorough FBI background checks nobody raised any

claim like this now all of us know from human experience that if someone is a

sexual predator if someone is committing the kind of actions that have been

alleged that it is very rare that they're a one-time offender but if

someone is carrying out this kind of conduct they typically have a pattern of

doing so over and over and over again we have seen powerful men throughout

society and politics in journalism in Hollywood whose careers have rightly

been ended but they've been ended for a pattern of harassment of abuse that

typically extends decades because when someone behaves like this they behave

like this over and over again there's no credible indication that that's occurred

indeed it's striking that in his 12 years as a federal appellate judge a

majority of his law clerks have been women that is exceptionally unusual I do

not know of another federal appellate judge for whom that is the case and I

can tell you his law clerks revere him they hold him in the very highest of

respect his reputation judge Cavanaugh his reputation in this town

is it being a Boy Scout is it being a boring Boy Scout that's been his

reputation for a long time now some might say well gosh and the press there

been these other sensational allegations we've seen others that have popped up

after this one well I thought it was striking in yesterday's hearing that not

a single Democratic member of this committee chose to ask about any of the

other allegations I think that indicates how little credibility there is behind

those allegations what the one that is the most sensational by the client of

mr. avenatti makes extraordinary claims which apparently our Democratic

colleagues are embarrassed to say publicly because they demonstrate that

this has become a partisan circus this is not about substance this is about

smears can I ask the senator if he could sum up the reason I've done that is

because I'd like to give everybody a chance to speak this committee has given

dr. Ford and judge Cavanaugh a full and fair opportunity to lay out their views

and I will say unfortunately the conduct of our Democratic colleagues it's been

clear that this has been all about politics all about delaying this

confirmation until after the election hoping that they win the Senate in the

election and then keeping this Supreme Court seat vacant until 2021 every

Democratic member of this committee before the confirmation hearing started

said they opposed judge Cavanaugh before a single thing started and not only that

this allegation the ranking member of this committee had it in writing on July

30th if on July 30th that had been reported to the committee chairman this

committee has a process to investigate it a process to investigate it that is

confidential that the FBI could have participated in investigating starting

back in July 30th that we could have had a hearing

that is closed that is not dragging either of these individuals through the

mud that's the way this process should have worked

and the testimony yesterday from dr. Ford is that the only people who had

copies of the letter were herself her lawyers representative su and the

ranking member of this committee dr. Ford further testified that neither she

nor her lawyers handed the letter over that leaves the only conclusion possible

is that the letter was leaked to the public by either of the two Democratic

members of Congress or their staff or that or someone else to whom they gave

it if there are only four people that have it and two did not give it then the

other two are the only possible sources and that unfortunately demonstrates a

cynicism a willingness to smear dr. Ford if it helps politically delay this

nomination I think we have an obligation to be fair to be impartial to listen to

the evidence to weigh the evidence that's the right thing to do and that's

what I hope this committee does and that's what I hope the full Senate does

thank you god bless you and God bless america

For more infomation >> Ted Cruz Takes Christine Ford's Case Into The Courtroom And SHREDS It Into A Million Pieces(VIDEO)!! - Duration: 17:49.

-------------------------------------------

WATCH Under Fire Senator Feinstein Blames FORD For Leak To The Media(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 11:15.

WATCH Under Fire Senator Feinstein Blames FORD For Leak To The Media

third acrux Thank You mr. chairman judge Cavanaugh you and your family have

been treated incredibly poorly by Senate Democrats and by the media and let me

say also I think dr. Ford and her family had been treated incredibly poorly by

Senate Democrats in the media you have both seen your good names dragged

through the mud and this has been sadly one of the most shameful chapters in the

history of the United States Senate let me say to you and your family thank you

for a lifetime of public service I will say watching your mother's pained face

has been heart-wrenching as she's seen her son's character dragged through the

mud after not only your lifetime of public service but her lifetime of

public service as well and I know as a father there's been

nothing more painful to you than talking to your daughters and explaining these

attacks that the media is airing I also believe though that the American people

are fair-minded people that the American people can set aside the partisan

warfare of Washington and look to substance and facts and that is the

charge of this committee now there have been three different sets of allegations

that have dominated the media I think it's important to note that two of those

sets of allegations had so little corroboration that even the New York

Times which is no conservative outlet refused to report on them because they

could find no basis for them and it was striking in his entire hearing that not

a single Democrat in this committee asked about two sets of those

allegations mr. Ramirez's allegations and the allegations of the client of mr.

abinanti not a single Democrat I don't know if they were just to embarrass mr.

Evan Eddie's allegations were so scandalous that the ranking member of

MIT 'add his clients most scandalous accusations

of you as a criminal mastermind essentially omitted those scandalous

accusations from her statement this hearing has focused rightly so on the

allegations dr. Ford presented and let me say I think the committee did the

right thing in giving dr. Ford a full and fair opportunity to tell her story

that's what we needed to do when these allegations became public and the

committee treated her with respect as we should i do not believe senate democrats

have treated you with respect what do we know we know that her testimony and your

testimony are in conflict a fair-minded Assessor of facts would then look to

what else do we know when you have conflicting testimony well we know that

dr. Ford identified three fact witnesses who she said observed what occurred all

three of those fact witnesses have stated on the record under penalty of

perjury that they do not recall what she is alleging happening they have not only

not not corroborated her charges they have explicitly refuted her charges

that's significant to a fair-minded fact-finder in addition you walked

through before this committee your calendars from the time now I will say

you were a much more organized teenager than I was and that many of us were but

it was a compelling recitation of night by night by night where you were in the

summer of 1982 that is yet another contemporaneous piece of fact to assess

what happened and we also know that the Democrats on this committee engaged in a

profoundly unfair process the ranking member had these allegations on July

30th and for 60 days that was 60 days ago

the ranking member did not refer it to the FBI for an investigation the ranking

member did not refer it to the full committee for an investigation the

ranking member this committee could have investigated those claims in a

confidential way that respected dr. Ford's privacy and some of the most

significant testimony we heard this morning as dr. Ford told this committee

if the only people to whom she gave her letter were her attorneys the ranking

member and her member of Congress and she stated that she and her attorneys

did not release the letter which means the only people that could have released

that that letter were either the ranking member and her staff or the Democratic

member of Congress because dr. Ford told this committee those are the only people

who had it that is not a fair process and we should look to the facts not

anonymous innuendo and slander Sherman I asked for a point of personal privilege

to respond mercy mr. chairman let me be clear I did not hide

dr. Ford's allegations I did not leak her story she asked me to hold it

confidential and I kept it confidential as she asked she apparently was stalked

by the press felt that what happened she was forced to come forward and her

greatest fear were realized was realized she's been harassed she's had death

threats and she's had to flee her home in addition the investigation that the

Republican majority is heralding is really nothing that I know about other

than a partisan practice normally all the witnesses would be interviewed

however that's not happened while the majority has reached out to several

people they did not notify me or my staff that they were doing this and so

ought to argue that we would not participate but not tell us what they

were up to is somewhat disingenuous I was given some information by a woman

who was very much afraid who asked that it be

held confidential and I held it confidential until she decided that she

would come forward mr. chairman would would the ranking member

answer a question please if I can I I have great respect for senator Feinstein

we've worked together on many topics and I believe what you just said can you

tell us that your staff did not leak it oh I don't believe my staff would leak

it I have not asked that question directly but you do not owe you know

that I mean how in the world did that get in the hands of the of the press the

answer is no the staff have you ever asked you know have you asked your staff

or other staff - with the Judiciary Committee pardon me

well a Jennifers reminds me I've asked her before about it well so that's true

well somebody leaked it if it wasn't you well it was I'm telling you it was not I

did not I mean I was asked to keep it confidential and and I'm criticized for

that too mr. chairman could I ask the Chairman a question which is does the

committee have a process if there is an allegation against any nominee to assess

that allegation in a confidential forum rather than in the public dread since

dr. Ford requested that it be kept confidential is there a process for the

committee for considering confidential allegations and the answer is yes and I

said senator Tillis pointed out the document that I put out to show of all

the things that we've done along the lines of your question and mr. chairman

what would you have done if on July 30th the ranking member had had raised this

allegation with you has the chairman of this committee how would you would have

done like we have done with every background or let's say FBI report that

comes from the White House with the nominee and then subsequent to that

because maybe the FBI got done with the three months ago we go through the FBI

or information comes to us then we have our investigators in a bipartisan

both Republicans and Democrats follow up on though whatever those questions are

or those problems would have to be worked out

so bipartisan investigators could have investigated this two months ago and it

could have been heard in a confidential setting without dr. Ford's name or judge

Cavanaugh's name being dragged through the mud wrecked and except for one or

two conversations that we had with the judge to our investigators Democrats

didn't participate except in those two but in those two or one or two they

didn't ask any questions Thank You mr. chairman I want to would mr. chairman we

ought Matt man respond it's my understanding that her story was leaked

before the letter became public and she testified that she had spoken to her

friends about it and it's most likely that that's how the story leaked and

that she had been asked by press but it did not leak from us I assure you of

that almost mr. chairman I I'm a little

confused I thought only the member of the House and senator Feinstein and her

lawyers had the letter so her friends she might have talked to about it

couldn't leak the letter if they just had a book verbal conversation unless

she gave that my copy of the letter senator I don't think the letter was

ever late well how did the press know to contact her about her complaint she

apparently she testified here this morning that she had talked to friends

about it and the press had talked to her

senator our judge a sense there was reference to the problems the legitimate

problems and the and the change of lifestyle that dr. Ford had if you want

some time to say the impact on your family I'll be glad to hear you if you

don't want to talk about that's okay I've talked about that it's okay then

senator Harris thank you bless you and God bless america

For more infomation >> WATCH Under Fire Senator Feinstein Blames FORD For Leak To The Media(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 11:15.

-------------------------------------------

After Using Her Feinstein Actually Threw Ford Under The Bus With Jaw-Dropping Accusation(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 11:02.

After Using Her Feinstein Actually Threw Ford Under The Bus With Jaw-Dropping Accusation

hey sir de croo Thank You mr. chairman judge Cavanaugh you and your family have