Thứ Hai, 26 tháng 3, 2018

Auto news on Youtube Mar 26 2018

Goodmorning all, it is early today!

06:15 am (!) but for a good cause...

an exclusive daytrip to Porsche Center Leipzig

what we'll be doing there; factory visit, driving on track and offroading with Porsches

Thanks to Offsite Vibes Events

There we go!

So cold!

We just arrived at Porsche Leipzig

I can't film in the factory...

because of privacy rules

but I can show you some footage of Porsche itself

Enjoy the factory tour!

So I just had the factory tour...

and I've learned that they build 600 cars per day here in Leipzig

with a focus on the Macan and Panamera

that used to be Cayenne too but did you know...

from 2003 - 2006 the Carrera GT was build here?!

Isn't that special guys?!

It is finally time to go outside...

It stopped snowing - oh no, it didn't actually

I think we've got a 718 Boxster and a 911 ready for us

we are also going to switch cars

Curious to see how I'm doing...

cause the instructor warned us it is wet and slippery

but we will see!

And from 911 to Cayenne

Because we are going offroad!

Yaaaaay!

What an amazing day it was

I loved every minute of it

it was interesting to see the birth place of the Porsches that are build here

but the whole program in general was exciting

both the offroad track and the race track got more exciting because of the weather

due to the wetness, snow and ice

that gave the whole program something extra

However, you need to experience this

If you are crazy about Porsche, you like speed, adrenaline...

sign up for the Porsche Bucket List Experience

organized by Offsite Vibes Events (link below)

I can say I really enjoyed myself today!

Thank you Offsite Vibes Events for the invite!

For more infomation >> Porsche Bucket List Experience [with English sub] - Duration: 4:45.

-------------------------------------------

Porsche Panamera 3.0 S E-HYBRID AUT8/LUCHTVERING/XENON/20"/NAVI/BTW - Duration: 1:01.

For more infomation >> Porsche Panamera 3.0 S E-HYBRID AUT8/LUCHTVERING/XENON/20"/NAVI/BTW - Duration: 1:01.

-------------------------------------------

Audi R8 RWS vs Porsche 911 GT3 - Duration: 7:22.

To you and I, the R8 RWS is just another version

of Audi's mid-engined supercar - RWS stands for Rear Wheel Series, which indicates the

removal of the front driveshafts.

This is the first rear-driven R8 and it'll be limited to 999 units worldwide, split across

Coupe and Spyder body styles.

The R8 range grows a little; life goes on.

But within the boardrooms and offices of Audi Sport, the R8 RWS must seem like an enormous

gamble.

In fact, we know it's an enormous gamble for Audi because it's taken the company twelve

years to take it.

For one thing, building a rear-wheel drive version of a halo model undermines the core

brand value Audi has spent the last few decades cultivating.

If we all drive the RWS and say it's more enjoyable than the existing R8, what on earth

does that say about Quattro?

It's like Tesla turning its back on batteries and electric motors altogether and fitting

its next model with a stinking great V8 instead.

And for another, even more troubling thing, by producing this car Audi opens itself up

to the most bruising head-to-head comparison of them all; the exact comparison we've chosen

to make right here.

It's an unspoken rule in the motoring world that you do not take on the Porsche 911 GT3.

Audi has just done exactly that.

Make no mistake, then; this car is an almighty punt.

By unbolting the standard R8's four-wheel drive gubbins, Audi has removed 50kg.

It couldn't trim that same amount out again if it ditched the powered leather seats in

favour of two beanbags and replaced every square inch of glass with clingfilm.

There's no dynamic steering and no adaptive damping, and the differential is a very unsophisticated

mechanical LSD.

The engine is the lesser of the two 5.2-litre normally aspirated V10s, but it's still good

for 540hp and 398lb ft.

All things considered, this is the R8 at its simplest and most uncluttered since the original

was retired three years ago.

Invariably, it'll be the edgiest R8, too, the one that demands the most of its driver.

In a bid to make the RWS anything other than a widow-maker for the modern era, though,

Audi has tweaked the suspension geometry and fitted a stiffer front anti-roll bar.

Rear-wheel drive makes the R8 a little more dangerous; dialling in a smidge more understeer

makes it a bit safer again.

Overall, the changes add up to the sweetest and most enjoyable second-generation R8 so

far.

The steering is uncorrupted now, and although it's certainly not the last word in detail

it is more natural and more faithful than any four-wheel drive R8's helm, particularly

any one that's fitted with dynamic steering.

The RWS is just a more pleasant and immersive thing to thread between the hedgerows, and

there's a lightness and a newfound responsiveness to the front axle.

The dampers, meanwhile, may be fixed rate, but they strike a good balance between bump

absorption and body control.

You don't so much feel the extra push that's been dialled into the chassis as sense the

front tyres just starting to scrub as you really stretch the R8 out.

Nor has disconnecting the front axle turned the R8 into some murderous oversteer machine.

There's so much inherent traction, even in the lower gears, that you're trying extremely

hard to unstick the thing before it starts to slide.

What's been lost?

Some outright cross-country pace, I'm sure, but only if you measure these things to the

tenth of a second.

And it probably is true that you would drive a four-wheel drive R8 a touch more boldly,

flinging it into bends with more abandon, safe in the knowledge that you could dig yourself

out of all manner of trouble just by hoofing it.

But for every one of those brain-out drives across some windswept moor, there must be

99 when you have only the space or inclination to link two or three bends, or lean on it

around a deserted roundabout, and it's in these short-lived but frequent moments that

the RWS is a touch more engaging than any other current R8.

Its steering is crisper; its chassis balance more delicate.

But we aren't here to compare the RWS to any other R8.

At first you might say the Audi is every bit as thrilling as the 911 GT3, because it's

just as fast and it makes its own ear-splitting soundtrack, but when you chop and change between

the two and drive each car across the same stretch of road, the gulf between them begins

to emerge.

The Audi does have the more fluid low speed ride, but at higher speeds that manifests

as looser body control and slightly fluffier responses.

The GT3 steers with more tactility, too, and its engine is more feral and intoxicating.

For all that the RWS is the most rewarding model in the R8 range, it is made to feel

rather half-hearted in the company of the 911 GT3.

It's like jumping out of an aeroplane with an instructor strapped to your back compared

to a solo jump.

What the R8 has on its side, though, is presence and theatre.

It looks absurdly low and wide and the engine is in the middle and, look, you can see it

through that glass panel!

And the view from the cabin is pure supercar.

A 911 GT3 is really just a 911 and you see them all the time.

But all that stuff is fleeting, none of it matters beyond the first week of ownership.

An extraordinary driving experience is more nourishing; much longer-lasting.

In all fairness to Audi Sport, though, it didn't set out to build a car as single-minded

as a GT3.

But if you introduce a sports car with a naturally aspirated engine that develops something like

500hp, then charge around £110,000 for it, you invite the comparison.

You couldn't write a series of novels about an English super-spy who carries a Walther

PPK and penetrates as many secret volcano lairs as knockout brunettes, then get all

cross when someone mentions the B-word.

All of which leaves me feeling there's more to come.

Well, the use of 'series' sort of implies as much, doesn't it?

Perhaps, some day soon, Audi will drop the Plus engine - with its 610hp peak output,

its 9000rpm redline, and its more ferocious power delivery - into this rear-driven chassis,

and perhaps it'll fit more aggressive tyres than Pirelli P Zeroes, and maybe it'll sharpen

up the car's responses.

That really would give the brains at Weissach something to fret about.

For more infomation >> Audi R8 RWS vs Porsche 911 GT3 - Duration: 7:22.

-------------------------------------------

WOW Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio Vs Porsche Macan Turbo - Duration: 5:17.

Congrats on having children and/or an active lifestyle.

Now you need a vehicle that can carry your progeny and/or surfboard.

However, you don't want to join the masses of identical crossovers because life's too

short for the norm, so why not aim high, and grab a premium SUV with the biggest engine

in the line up.

Enter stage right: Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio and Porsche Macan Turbo (with Performance

Pack).

Both the Alfa and the Porsche do fairly well in the 'huge numbers' stakes.

Alfa's decided to stuff the Giulia Quadrifoglio's biturbocharged 2.9-liter turbocharged V6 into

its new SUV.

The outcome is a 505-pull, 443 pound-feet creature equipped for breaking 0 to 60 miles

for each hour 3.6 seconds and hitting 176 mph.

Then again, the Porsche gets a greater biturbocharged 3.6-liter turbo V6 with a lower 440 hp control

yield.

Torque sits at 442 lb-ft.

The run to 60 mph takes 4.2 seconds and it'll top out at a pleasingly extensive 169 mph.

Be that as it may, it has another enormous number significant: weight.

The Porsche tips the scales at 4,244 pounds, while the Alfa tips the scales short of 4,360

pounds.

The German's numbers might be vast, however perhaps substantial in the wrong places.

With regards to looks the Alfa has the Porsche beat.

While the German car looks quite great looking on its desolate, the Stelvio influences it

to look rather tasteless when the two are put one next to the other.

Porsche's straight lines and "I'm identified with a 911" looks are just fine, yet when

you see Alfa's swooping, flared, vented, formed shape, particularly considering the measure

of land to play with, it's pretty in fact.

There might be a lot of energy on offer, and one looks immensely superior to the next,

however shouldn't something be said about living with your decisions?

The Porsche's infotainment framework may not be the most recent Porsche tech (see the Panamera

for that), however it functions admirably, is instinctive, and doesn't chafe.

The Alfa's then again… the less said in regards to it the better.

Be that as it may, the Italian car accompanies a messiness free focus stack while the Porsche

is as yet sticking on to the old-school, catch overwhelming methods for the past.

On the off chance that you didn't spec something on your Macan, Porsche puts a "glance at how

shabby I am" plastic blanking plate where your well deserved contraptions could have

been.

Cargo space isn't scarce in either car – the Porsche gets 17.7 cubic feet with the seats

up and 53.0 with them down.

The Alfa edges it somewhat with 18.5 cubic feet seats-up and 56.5 with everything collapsed

level.

However, the Alfa's reasonableness win is brief since seeing out of the back of it is

a test.

Its back window is so little it truly needn't be there, and turning your make a beeline

for complete a blindspot check is worthless – the adapted back window line makes an

enormous blind side itself.

Then again the Porsche is anything but difficult to see out of, however its back window is

similarly as entertainingly little as the Stelvio's.

Numbers are a certain something, driving is something totally unique.

The Alfa's snort surges it forward in a somewhat agitating manner – you just don't expect

something so huge and tall to move very that rapidly.

While the Porsche feels like the genuine article, the additional drama that accompanies the

Quadrifoglio's commotion makes the Italian feel like a significantly all the more energizing

machine.

Without a doubt, the Macan influences a wonderful to burble, however it has nothing on Alfa's

most recent.

The Stelvio has an immensely delicate throttle; slight data sources can have a tremendous

effect, giving it a forceful quality that the Macan needs.

Porsche's cars are altogether intended for a touch of light track utilize and in that

capacity they're all quite skillful around them.

Where the Alfa appears jumpy and tense, the Porsche is formed, adjusted, and simple to

drive rapidly.

The German handles superior to the intense Alfa, that is without a doubt.

The two cars, unexpectedly, can go a touch sideways in the correct hands...

In case you're out for a fun drive however, both will engage, yet the Alfa has the sound

to coordinate its looks and execution.

And the winner is…

The Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio.

Not on the grounds that it's the better car – it's profoundly imperfect – but since

it's better time.

It shows you that cars can be boisterous, rowdy, and influence you to smile like a crazy

person in a pleasingly old-school way.

The Alfa is difficult to suggest as something besides a 'heart' car, the sort of car you

purchase not for resale esteem, but rather on the grounds that you know you'll cherish

it while you have it.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét