Thứ Tư, 23 tháng 8, 2017

Auto news on Youtube Aug 23 2017

English caption coming soon

English caption coming soon

English caption coming soon

English caption coming soon

For more infomation >> [試騎] 2018 Suzuki GSX-S750 Test Ride - Duration: 16:00.

-------------------------------------------

Suzuki Grand Vitara - Duration: 1:10.

For more infomation >> Suzuki Grand Vitara - Duration: 1:10.

-------------------------------------------

aGroup test: MG 3 vs Suzuki Swift vs Dacia Sandero vs Mitsubishi Mirage39531 - Duration: 11:54.

Group test: MG 3 vs Suzuki Swift vs Dacia Sandero vs Mitsubishi Mirage

There's fun to be had in the budget hatch sector, but who's having most of it? Lets find out. Tin can is onomatopoeic (go on, kick one down the road.

Not a whiff, here, of the legion graphic pack and wheel whim customisation options which strike us as one of the MG's stronger selling points. They're either tilting at understatement or, perhaps, metallic grey is the new slack-jawed punter lure?.

Delivery of fun-on-a-budget promise prompted our Car of the Year award in 2005. But can the Swift survive the unsolicited accolade of being the most expensive car here? Never thought we'd say that about a Suzuki in a groupie.

An empty one, obviously. 'TIN. CAN Tin Can tincantin…' Renault's Romanian success, relentlessly billed as the cheapest car in Britain. Even this, um, posh 'Ambience' version is only just over £8k. .

First facelift since soundly slated 2013 launch version. Front and rear styling makeover, extra equipment, improved sound deadening, extra soft-touch cabin materials and revised suspension. Hope the steering's better. .

Styled by a dog chewing Play-Doh. Amazing what 60 Longbridge designers can achieve with a Fabia, Punto and Clio cut 'n' paste conflagration; in this company the car looks almost alert. Styled in China it would probably look more GM than MG.

Appeal probably lies more in the Saab 900-style glazing curves than the 'Careful with that Ceremonial Scimitar, Eugene' headlamps, but the third gen Swift is pleasantly proportioned, without having to try too hard.

Not really styled at all, in truth, other than in an unassuming, non-threatening, Saturday morning showroom 'That's-quite-a-large-box-for-not-much-money-isn't-it-dear?' way. Roger Buys a Fridge.

By someone armed with a chrome lip-gloss pencil, more like. If you ever meet anyone who says 'WOW; I've just got to have me one of those', take them to the vet to be put down.

Ottoman ease or osteopath-soliciting origami?. Dreadful, reconstituted stocking-filler plastics and a smattering of fabric struggle to sweeten the bitterness of the interior design pill. Lipstick scrawl upholstery motif detracts from acceptable front seat comfort.

Plenty of plastic, but still the best quality interior here. Seat comfortable, and only contender with rake and reach steering adjustment, but driving position marred by left leg/centre console spat.

Driving position not bad once dog's eaten gearchange-hindering centre arm rest. Seat comfy in a soggy, gently short-lived fashion, but rear seat bench dominatrix-firm. Less rear seat room than Mirage, but bigger loadspace.

Plastic and piano black interior finish not bad, despite the odd exposed screw head. Reach-only steering adjust but driving position acceptably comfy, with room for clutch foot. Cavernous rear seating, but diminutive loadspace.

Just what does MP3 stand for anyway?. Range topping specification includes air-con, Bluetooth, DAB radio and, yes, MP3 compatibility. Shame the execrable stereo panel and steering wheel switchgear design makes it all feel a tad 'Now Please Wash Your Hands' to use.

Top spec car with all the toys; gently aftermarket feel touchscreen, DAB radio, air-con, Bluetooth, electric front and rear windows, keyless go, cruise control, ugly children glass, and the only offering here with sat-nav.

Dunno; but this Ambience spec includes a USB port for it, and Bluetooth, and a CD player with two whole speakers, and a front passenger Jesus handle. Renault switchgear looks better in a Dacia than in a Renault.

Heated seats, air-con, toddler wilful auto wipers. Multimedia looks dated but works okay. No USB to be found despite listing in spec, so successful phone pairing with voice activation at second attempt.

Slow as a plumber going for his tools.

1.5-litre lump feels tight and reluctant to pull. At 60mph in fifth, you can bounce your throttle foot up and down as if inflating a Lilo whilst in a foul mood, to no effect whatsoever. .

On paper, yes; with 1.2-litre Dualjet engine focused on headline-grabbing mpg and tax-dodging CO2 rather than jowl-adjusting performance. But the unit's eager to please and the gearchange is encouraging.

Vies with Mirage for eager three-cylinder turbo noises-off award. Sandero quicker despite greater weight than Mitsubishi, gearchange much better too. Hollow tin can interior promotes healthy meld of road/wind/engine noise.

Three-pot turns car to bullied blancmange at idle, but fantastically eager to rev. Gearchange shoddy; reverse a well-kept secret. Soundproofing added, but insufficient to prevent cabin acoustics succumbing to car's inner can. Rolls like a labrador in fox poo.

Actually, in the handling stakes, it verges on the amusing, despite steering feel of overcooked squid which, bizarrely, weights up as speeds fall. Beyond first-car-fun velocities, however, composure collapses as abruptly as a jilted bride.

Nope; dynamically the most appealing of the group. Quite firm undercarriage, but well shackled body roll, accurate steering and very nice balance as speeds rise. Old school, brake-free driving required to maintain momentum. Fun.

Suspension is tough so less body roll than anticipated. Ride somewhat lumpen, but steering far more connected and meatier than Mirage. Not as prone to understeer as Mirage either. Caution: steering refuses to self-centre.

Alarming.

Ride niggly, but dominated by extraordinary steering which feels more like a suggestion than a command, occasionally feeling as if the car is toppling off an invisible jack. Dynamics can't keep up with lusty little powerplant.

Verdict. Feels the most grown up machine here in every department, and a lower spec Swift can be had for less than £10,000. Almost styled, almost engaging, almost cheap enough. Badly needs a more sophisticated powerplant and, er, a shouty roof graphic.

A basic car that needs to remain basic so that you can buy it at a stupid price. Or there's always that secondhand Fiesta….

A model responsible for less than 5% of Mitsubishi's total UK sales and, despite facelift and modest revisions, still feels like it.

 £12,849 .  £12,849 .  1242cc 16v 4-cyl, 89bhp @ 6000rpm, 89lb ft @ 4400rpm .  5-speed manual, front-wheel drive .

 12. 3sec 0-62mph, 102mph, 65.  1030kg .  Now .   ★★★.

£10,499 . £10,894 . 1498cc 16v 4-cyl, 105bhp @ 6000rpm, 101lb ft @ 4750rpm . 5-speed manual, front-wheel drive .

4sec 0-62mph, 108mph, 51. 1150kg . Now . ★★★.

£7595 . £8115 . 898cc 12v turbo 3-cyl, 89bhp @ 5250rpm, 99lb ft @ 2250rpm . 5-speed manual, front-wheel drive .

1sec 0-62mph, 109mph, 57. 962kg .  ★★★.

£10,999 . £11,029 . 1193cc 12v 3-cyl, 79bhp @ 6000rpm, 78lb ft @ 4000rpm . 5-speed manual, front-wheel drive .

7sec 0-62mph, 112mph, 65. 845kg . Now .  ★★★.

For more infomation >> aGroup test: MG 3 vs Suzuki Swift vs Dacia Sandero vs Mitsubishi Mirage39531 - Duration: 11:54.

-------------------------------------------

Suzuki Celerio - Duration: 1:10.

For more infomation >> Suzuki Celerio - Duration: 1:10.

-------------------------------------------

Suzuki Swift 1.3 3-DRS GS(AIRCO!!!) - Duration: 0:42.

For more infomation >> Suzuki Swift 1.3 3-DRS GS(AIRCO!!!) - Duration: 0:42.

-------------------------------------------

Suzuki SX4 1.6 COMFORT AIRCO | LEER | TREKHAAK - Duration: 0:54.

For more infomation >> Suzuki SX4 1.6 COMFORT AIRCO | LEER | TREKHAAK - Duration: 0:54.

-------------------------------------------

Suzuki Ignis 1.2 Dualjet SZ-T (2017) review - Duration: 7:47.

Suzuki Ignis 1.2 Dualjet SZ-T (2017) review

When we first clapped eyes on Suzuki's reinvention of the Ignis at the Paris motor show, the opinion in the office was optimistic. Sure, it's more crossover-y than ever before, but there's no denying the new design is a lot of fun.

It finds itself sat in an area of the market without much competition, which is surprising considering how quickly the B-SUV sector continues to grow.

The Ford Ka+ is probably closest in concept, but Suzuki reckons it'll tempt buyers from the Vauxhall Adam Rocks, Fiat's best-selling 500 and even BMW's ever-popular Mini. Stop laughing at the back, please.

Thing is, the Ignis looks set to undercut all of those cars on the forecourt. Pricing's going to be announced shortly after this article's publication, but we've been led to expect the entry-level SZ-3's price will start with a 10.

Tell us more about that design…. It's been penned to evoke memories of 'iconic' (this word was banded about a lot on the launch) Suzukis of yore.

Yep, you read that right: there are shades of the ever-ready Jimny there, but the main inspiration was the Giugiaro-designed rear-engined SC100 'Whizzkid' kei car once owned and championed by revered CAR columnist LJK Setright.

That's what the three diagonal lines on the overly wide C-pillar are meant to hark back to, anyway. Is it a whizzkid to drive?.

In some ways yes, and in many, no. This car's based on the same platform as the ugly-yet-likeable Baleno – dubbed Suzuki Next 100 – and that means it weighs about as much as a spanner.

In fact, in some guises it tips the scales at just 810kg, so you'd be forgiven for expecting great things from the handling.

Its steering is admittedly very sharp, and while you don't get much sense of what's going on under the skinny front tyres, its lack of heft means it's keen to switch trajectory.

It can't match the Smart Fortwo's turning circle (a car that'll U-turn around a tent peg), but we found the Ignis very manoeuvrable in town, which is unreservedly its natural stomping ground.

Head out onto the motorway and the tall Ignis catches the wind like a kite, eliciting worrying corrective action from the driver as this featherweight tries its level best to change lanes by itself. Is the engine line-up extensive?.

Nope. Powering every Ignis is Suzuki's four-pot 1.2-litre Dualjet petrol motor, available with or without the SHVS system, which the marketing bumf calls a mild hybrid system and we call a glorified stop-start arrangement.

We'd go without SHVS – which confusingly stands for Smart Hybrid Vehicle by Suzuki – because it detracts from the driving experience in the name of a handful of grams of CO2.

It has the effect of dulling the already staid power delivery of the motor, and with performance figures as pedestrian as the Ignis's, that's a sacrifice too far.

We noticed a curiously pronounced effect on the ride quality with the CO2-saving tech on board, too, with far less compliance on SHVS-equipped cars (tested in both front- and four-wheel drive derivatives) than is necessary.

Over poor road surfaces it was simply uncomfortable, and hitting a bump too hard it felt like the chassis was going to bend.

The sole gearbox we've tried so far is a perfectly functional five-speed manual. There's an automated version of the same box on offer too for those that need or want it, and thankfully no CVT in sight. What about the Boosterjet?.

Ah, the brilliant three-pot from the Baleno, you mean. You can't have that in the Ignis. It's too expensive to engineer into this cheaper car, according to the firm's representatives, despite using the very same platform.

We can't help thinking that's a crying shame, because it would dramatically improve the character of what is ostensibly a quirky-looking car with fairly humdrum underpinnings.

The dash is a curiously busy two-tone hard plastic design; black on top and white on the bottom.

Adding to this are colour-customisable air vents (carbonfibre-effect in our car, naturally) and cup-holder surround in the centre console – a feature that feels like it was made from the cheapest plastic this side of a packet of clingfilm.

In fact, since your leg rests upon it, we can't see this lasting more than a few thousand miles before something snaps.

This random approach to fascia arrangement is all the more catastrophic thanks to the touchscreen, which looks very much like an aftermarket affair with a thick black perimeter tacked on.

Apparently you can control the screen wearing gloves, which perhaps hints at the sorts of buyers who'll actually get an Ignis, regardless of the 'funky' customisation options on offer. And don't even try to use the sat-nav in a hurry.

It takes far too long to boot up and ask anything taxing of the maps – such as zooming in and out quickly – and it throws an almighty wobbly.

Rear passengers may prefer you pick an Ignis in a spec above base, because you'll want the sliding and reclining individual seats to make life a little more comfortable when sat in the dimly lit back.

You'll have a lot of headroom regardless of where you sit, though. Oh, and one final point: Euro NCAP scored all versions of the Ignis except the top-spec SZ5 a meagre three stars in 2016's crash tests.

Verdict. The new Ignis doesn't move the game on in any demonstrable way, but its main advantage is its price.

There aren't too many cars around that offer this blend of low running costs, realistic space for four and a list price that'll even keep Dacia honest.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét