Thứ Tư, 26 tháng 9, 2018

Auto news on Youtube Sep 27 2018

Just as Christine Blasey Ford's case against Brett Kavanaugh blows up as all four of her

witnesses deny ever being at the gathering, the Democrats immediately roll out a new accuser,

Deborah Ramirez.

That's when Senator Dianne Feinstein got sloppy and now is in a heap of trouble.

In fact, the Democrats have just been caught red-handed "fixing evidence" that proves

this continued Kavanaugh smear campaign is nothing but one big ruse.

You do not want to miss this.

Remember when last week Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley was furious at Senator

Dianne Feinstein?

Grassley blasted Feinstein for refusing to turn over Christine Ford's original letter

dated July 30th, and now we know why.

Fox News reports, "Saying Feinstein 'chose to sit on the allegations until a politically

opportune moment,' Grassley demanded she immediately turn over an unredacted copy of

the letter from Kavanaugh's accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, that Feinstein received July

30."

Well, the wait is over.

After Ford's case blew up as her lifelong friend and final witness, Leland Ingham Keyser,

denied the leftist professor's allegations, the Democrats conveniently roll out a new

accuser, Deborah Ramirez, who's accusations cannot be corroborated by any of her so-called

witnesses either.

But, Feinstein, thinking Ford's case had given the Democrats the needed time to stall

and roll out this new accuser, decided they no longer needed to protect Ford.

So Feinstein turned over the original letter dated July 30th.

And boy oh boy, was that a huge mistake.

The Ford letter to Feinstein dated July 30th has obviously been altered or fixed.

It displays different fonts and does not reflect that this was written by a college professor.

It's that poorly written.

Something stinks here.

It's especially important to note the different fonts are found as "Ford" names Kavanaugh,

witnesses, and dates:

July 30, 2018 CONFIDENTIAL Senator Dianne Feinstein

Dear Senator Feinstein: I am writing with information relevant in

evaluating the current nominee to the Supreme Court.

As a constituent, I expect that you will maintain this as confidential until we have further

opportunity to speak.

Brett Kavanaugh physically and sexually assaulted me during High School in the early 1980's.

He conducted these acts with the assistance of his close friend, Mark G. Judge.

Both were 1-2 years older than me and students at a local private school.

The assault occurred in a suburban Maryland area home at a gathering that included me

and 4 others.

Kavanaugh physically pushed me into a bedroom as i was headed for a bathroom up a short

stairwell from the living room.

They locked the door and played loud music, precluding any successful attempts to yell

for help.

Kavanaugh was on top of me while laughing with Judge, who periodically jumped onto Kavanaugh.

They both laughed as Kavanaugh tried to disrobe me in their highly inebriated state.

With Kavanaugh's hand over my mouth, I feared he may inadvertently kill me.

From across the room, a very drunken Judge said mixed words to Kavanaugh ranging from

"go for it to "stop".

At one point when Judge jumped onto the bed, the weight on me was substantial.

The pile toppled, and the two scrapped with each other.

After a few attempts to get away, was able to take this opportune moment to get up and

run across to a hallway bathroom.

I locked the bathroom door behind me.

Both loudly stumbled down the stairweil, at which point other persons at the house were

talking with them.

I exited the bathroom, ran outside of the house and went home.

I have not knowingly seen Kavanaugh since the assault.

I did see Mark Judge once at the Potomac Village Safeway, where he was extremely uncomfortable

seeing me.

I have received medical treatment regarding the assault.

On July 6, I notified my local government representative to ask them how to proceed

with sharing this information.

It is upsetting to discuss sexual assault and its repercussions, yet i felt guilty and

compelled as a citizen about the idea of not saying anything

I arn available to speak further should you wish to discuss.

I am currently vacationing in the midAtlantic until August 7th and will be in California

after August 10 In Confidence, Christine Blasey Palo Alto,

California

So, the Democrats have now moved on to this new accuser.

Sure, they will go ahead and let Blasey-Ford testify, what do they have to lose?

It's just a stall tactic.

Now, this new accuser, Deborah Ramirez, has a sleazy account of playing a drinking game

at Yale University that should never have been published.

Why?

Well, for the same reasons other mainstream outlets refused to publish it.

Even the New York Times refused to publish this

For more infomation >> Ford's Case Blows Up, Democrats Roll Out New Accuser & Are Caught 'Fixing Evidence' - Duration: 5:39.

-------------------------------------------

Trump: GOP had jammed through Kavanaugh's nomination without hearing from Ford - Duration: 1:23.

For more infomation >> Trump: GOP had jammed through Kavanaugh's nomination without hearing from Ford - Duration: 1:23.

-------------------------------------------

Joe diGenova: Mazie Hirono Should 'Shut Up,' Ford's Allegations Are 'Figment Of Her Imagination' - Duration: 6:22.

For more infomation >> Joe diGenova: Mazie Hirono Should 'Shut Up,' Ford's Allegations Are 'Figment Of Her Imagination' - Duration: 6:22.

-------------------------------------------

GOP hires prosecutor Rachel Mitchell to question Ford - Duration: 4:18.

For more infomation >> GOP hires prosecutor Rachel Mitchell to question Ford - Duration: 4:18.

-------------------------------------------

Brett Kavanaugh Accuser May NOT Show Up To Senate Hearing Makes NEW Demand(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 14:33.

Brett Kavanaugh Accuser May NOT Show Up To Senate Hearing Makes NEW Demand

I think he's just a wonderful human being I mean I I think it's horrible

what the Democrats have done it's a con game they're playing econo they're

really con artists this they're trying to convince and you know they don't like

they don't believe us themselves okay they know he's a high quality person

they don't believe it's just resist and obstruct they're playing a con game and

they play it very well they play it actually much better than Republicans

that was president earlier today talking about the Democrats delay tactics on the

Kavanagh nomination it's this simple it's a battle between those who value

the core principles of this country and those who only value cheap political

victories now from day one Republicans have treated the confirmation process of

judge Kavanagh with the seriousness it deserves Democrats they have not they

created chaos at judge Cavanaugh's hearings interrupting as you saw dozens

of times there were constant outbursts from left-wing protesters disrupting the

proceedings and much more now just days away from a formal vote after all of the

hearings were over and Senator Dianne Feinstein she drops a bombshell an

allegation from a woman accusing judge Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct going

back 36 years when they were both in high school now Feinstein knew about

these allegations since July she kept them secret

now she kept them secret when she met privately with judge Kavanaugh she kept

them secret when she questioned Kavanaugh publicly and Feinstein used an

allegation serious allegation of sexual misconduct as a political ploy to delay

and disrupt Cavanaugh's confirmation now despite all of this to their credit

Republicans have rightly taken these accusations against judge Kavanaugh

seriously as they should a public hearing featuring both Kavanagh

and his kkuk user professor Christine Ford has been set for Thursday tonight

there is still a chance we now have news Ford may not appear Senator Dianne

Feinstein said she cannot guarantee that she will show up

the Ford has concerns about the independent female attorney hired to

question both Ford and Cavanaugh Republicans clearly are trying to do

everything in their power as they have been doing to accommodate professor Ford

in an op-ed on foxnews.com former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich he

wrote quote if not judge Kavanagh then who this is the question Republicans

need to ask themselves as they prepare for Thursday Senate Judiciary Committee

hearing joining us now is new Cambridge don't forget by the way his new book

Trump's America it's available now part two of which talks about all the

challenges the president will face mr. speaker I want you look at the fact I am

Feinstein had this literally had this in July she didn't bring it up till now

then the people that Professor Ford mentioned all of them deny it and then

you got the New Yorker article where miss Ramirez admit she was inebriated

very early slurring her words gaps in American memory etc and then you have

the new face of the Democratic Party says all I'm going to reveal gang-raped

by in the next 48 hours I don't know what what are the American people to

think and so many Democrats rushing to judgment no presumption of innocence

look I think what the American people should think is that you have a

Democratic Party so desperate to stop the Supreme Court from becoming

conservative that they are prepared to lie to smear to be hysterical to break

Senate rules to do whatever they have to do what you're watching is a party

totally desperate and you've got to put this week in context I was struck

earlier today that Arthur Miller's great play The Crucible

which is about the Salem Witchcraft Trials Axia relates to what's happening

to judge Cavanaugh what he's being put through is almost like a medieval

torture somebody shows up thirty-five years later everybody in the audience I

don't think about this close your eyes for a second and ask what were you doing

on June 12th 35 years ago the truth is you almost certainly don't know and the

fact it is this hearing is a farce there's nothing that Cavanaugh can say

which will convince Chuck Schumer to vote for him and I think that dr. Ford

has no evidence other than her own word which is going to count

she can't they can't provide any witnesses she can't even tell us to the

best of my knowledge what was the date where was the house who all were there

the people she names all say they weren't there now at what point is the

burden of common sense on the accuser and if it's a burden of common sense

this hearing wouldn't even be held it's only in the current hyper environment in

which senator Hirono can say men ought to just shut up I mean think about the

level of venom in that sentence you have an entire effort by the

totalitarian left to to bludgeon us you saw it last night as you reported with

senator Cruz and his wife I mean what has happened to America when random

left-wing totalitarian think they can violate private property

trespass on a restaurant go in and intimidate a citizen who's simply trying

to have dinner and they think they're heroes and apparently the police aren't

called nobody's arrested for trespass nobody's arrested for intimidation we're

watching a period where what we ought to understand is this is about raw power

and if the left can't stop Cavanaugh we will not get another conservative

justice in our lifetime on the Supreme Court you talked about his four decades

as an exemplary husband father friend judges bent over 220 people that have

come out and said this guy is a cut above a gentleman's gentleman

and that I'm listening to these lawmakers many of them when they say I

believe in the case of Professor forward or I believe miss Ramirez but they're

really saying is they don't want to hear anything they don't believe in due

process they don't believe in the presumption of innocence and I gotta be

honest how does a lawmaker say he has to prove his innocence we've had lawmakers

say that senator Coons said he has to prove his innocence from 40 years ago 36

years look look there's a whole block of left-wing Democrats whether it's Coons

or a Schumer or it's a variety of other people on the Left they're hopeless they

have no interest in the truth they're involved in a struggle over power

they've got to pay off their activists base there there's no possibility that

they're going to vote for judge Kavanagh but what I am fascinated with is let's

say you're the senator from West Virginia or Missouri or Indiana or North

Dakota or Montana now you're from an area where there are a lot of common

sense everyday folks who like Donald Trump who believe Donald Trump's doing

the right thing who want to have a more conservative Court you

see the newly the junior senator from Alabama do you really want to line up

with Chuck Schumer and the left away with Booker and his pathetic portrait of

Spartacus which is a historian I found particularly offensive II clearly had no

idea who Spartacus was I think these senators who are from states where

there's a lot of common sense a lot of conservatism a desire for more

conservatives we have not heard a single one of them yet and I will be very

surprised if we don't have a number of them vote yes remember when when the

Clarence Thomas character assassination was under way 11 Democrats ended up

voting YES for Clarence Thomas and I think we may find all of a sudden once

year through Thursday there's several of these Democrats from Trump States decide

in the end you know she didn't prove her case I'm going to vote yes he deserves

to be on the court he also has a 40-year track record I think your observation is

Right 42 days in the election ah I can tell you that people that I hear from

three hours a day on radio and that watch this show they are angry because

instinctively Americans believe in due process they believe in fundamental

fairness they don't believe in a rush to judgment we have seen in high-profile

cases Duke Lacrosse Ferguson Missouri Baltimore Freddie gray Trayvon Martin

Cambridge police we've seen a lot of rushing to judgment where a lot of the

same people have been wrong again and again but as far as the Republicans go

it seems like it's coming down to four people for them and they have control of

this that would be bob Corker that would be Jeff Flake I think susan collins

probably had the best comment of anybody saying with Dianne Feinstein's it is

unfair to everybody in this case and lisa murkowski i don't know what to

expect from any of them tonight

well I don't need that I mean I think Thursday is important only in the sense

that unless dr. Ford is overwhelmingly convincing and unless judge Kavanagh is

overwhelmingly disappointing I suspect all four of the Republicans will end up

deciding that there is no case adequate to say no at the same time I believe as

I just said that there are five or six Democrats who are on the bubble who have

to go home and explain why they voted with with Schumer and why they voted

with Warren and why they voted with Booker and I think that this could be a

very expensive vote in terms of defeating five or six or seven Democrats

because I think their states are going to say to them you know there's no proof

here the justifies voting no on judge Kavanagh all right Mr Speaker we

appreciate your time sorry you couldn't make it here you're in DC but you

wouldn't even come see us and we're outside and the capital bond is

beautiful no all I tell you is Calista had a better offer Wow all right I don't

blame her I don't blame you a good choice good to

see you sir Thank You penny young Nance's president and CEO of Concerned

Women for America she sort of piece arguing that Christine Ford's account of

an assault by Brett Kavanaugh is missing essential details the rest of us need to

assess it penny young man's joins us tonight

hey thanks all for coming on it's great to be here thanks so I think most people

watching this came into it with a pretty open mind

I know feminists always say no one believes the woman but most people I

know want to believe that's right but it's hard because there are missing

details what should we know that we don't in order to assess well first let

me tell you I'm coming at this as a woman who has been a victim of an

attempted rape and a physical assault when I was pregnant with my first child

and a running path in Virginia I have written a whole chapter in my book about

that issue I've testified before Congress advocating for women and

victims of sexual violence advocating for the Debbie Smith act and written

numerous you know up ads about this this is an important issue to my heart but I

care about justice and that's the missing piece here we do

believe that a person is innocent till proven guilty in this case and it is

we've got judge Cavanaugh and in a possible position people have noted this

you know I would like to believe that women are always morally superior to men

as the head of Concerned Women for America but the Duke Lacrosse case and

lena Dunham's book and you know even going back to classic literature to like

to kill a mockingbird we know that's not always true because we are broken people

the best that we can do is try to get to the truth and I'll show you that not

every woman always tells the truth in every in sadly that is the case of

course it is and we know that you don't immediately become more moral because

you because you're a woman that's why justice must be blind justice has to be

blind to everything gender race socio economics age and we're counting on that

and if we get away from that notion it is dangerous for our nation it's

dangerous for everyone in our country if the presumption is that people are

judged on the basis of their sex or race right well they're immutable

characteristics that's not a component you say that's right

it absolutely is not now listen I believe that I believe women and I think

we have a right to use our voice in a speak up and as a victim we have to have

the opportunity to come forward and share our perspective but we also need

to understand that we deserve to give justice to everyone in this nation and

concern women for America is therefore Judge Cavanaugh we still support him if

something changes if we actually is proven that he's a sexual predator or

anyone sitting on the Supreme Court today we would be the first people

calling for impeachment we would be leading the charge but that's not where

we are and so we strongly are still in support of him in fact we're doing a

women's for Cavanaugh rally Thursday morning behind the Senate Russell

Building 8:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. any of your viewers that when it come would be

welcome this is an important moment for conservative women to speak up on this

issue penny Nance thank you very much for that

thank you thank you god bless you and God bless america

For more infomation >> Brett Kavanaugh Accuser May NOT Show Up To Senate Hearing Makes NEW Demand(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 14:33.

-------------------------------------------

Kavanaugh Gets the Upper Hand on Ford's Legal Team With This GENIUS Move - Duration: 2:00.

For more infomation >> Kavanaugh Gets the Upper Hand on Ford's Legal Team With This GENIUS Move - Duration: 2:00.

-------------------------------------------

Christine Ford Finds Four People to 'Corroborate' Her Claims, But There's One BIG Problem - Duration: 4:11.

For more infomation >> Christine Ford Finds Four People to 'Corroborate' Her Claims, But There's One BIG Problem - Duration: 4:11.

-------------------------------------------

Republicans Set Kavanaugh Vote Within 24 Hours Of Christine Ford's Testimony - Duration: 4:18.

Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee have scheduled a confirmation hearing in committee

for Brett Kavanaugh this coming Friday at 9:30 a.m.

Eastern time.

Now, the reason that time is important, knowing that it's at 9:30, is that that is less than

24 hours after Dr. Christine Ford will be testifying in front of that committee about

what she alleges happened to her at the hands of Brett Kavanaugh nearly 35 years ago.

Less than 24 hours.

Republicans are not only not going to give the public enough time to digest what this

woman has to say, but they won't even have enough time to digest it, order hearings,

order investigations, none of it.

They want to move forward and plow through this nomination, and they don't care what

Dr. Christine Ford has to say.

They've made that clear.

Lindsey Graham expressly said that.

That no matter what this woman says, he's voting to confirm.

They don't care.

They don't care.

They don't take it seriously.

They don't believe her, so they're going to push forward and be horrible human beings,

and then make the Democrats have to come back next January, assuming they retake the Senate,

which seems more and more likely every day, and then they're the ones that have to clean

up this mess.

That's what's going to happen here.

And then Republicans are going to be sitting there with egg on their face, knowing that

they could have prevented it.

They could have ordered an FBI investigation.

They could have taken it seriously.

But instead, they were so desperate to get one victory before this year's midterms, because

they have nothing else to run on, so they are willing to put through an accused rapist

and assaulter just to try to take that back to the voters and say, "Look what we did:

a thing."

Yeah, it's a horrible thing, you idiots.

Here's what's happening: Republicans don't have anything to run on this year.

They tried to run on tax cuts.

They spent millions of dollars running ads during primaries and so far through the midterms,

trying to tell people that their tax cuts were helping them.

Well, that message fell flat.

In fact, they went to some areas of the country, their states, where they tried to find people

who've gotten money from the tax cuts, to kind of parade them out on stage.

They couldn't find anybody.

That actually happened.

They couldn't find a single person in their audience who got any money from the tax cuts,

so they've had to pull back on that.

They can't run on repealing Obamacare because they know that their constituents hate that

idea now, after they tried it multiple times last year and faced huge backlash for it.

They don't have a Hillary Clinton on the other side of the ticket to run against.

They have nothing.

What they wanted to run on was taking over the Supreme Court.

But you put up a guy that you didn't vet, you didn't look into his history enough, and

now you're refusing to look into his history, just so you can get that seat.

And it's going to cost you yours.

You put him on that seat, you're going to lose your seat.

That's basically what voters are telling Republicans right now.

It's what polls are showing.

And it's what's going to happen.

Because Brett Kavanaugh, sadly, is going to be confirmed to the US Supreme Court, unless

the man himself voluntarily withdraws his nomination, he's in, for now.

Democrats eventually are going to take back the Senate.

Maybe it's in January, maybe it's two years, maybe it's four years from now.

But when they do, they're going to launch investigations, they're going to hold impeachment

hearings, and they're going to remove Kavanaugh from the bench.

Yes, Kavanaugh will end up on the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh will also end up impeached from the Supreme Court.

Those are my two predictions, and I would say, based on all of the available evidence,

that's the most likely scenario to happen here.

But the fact that Republicans aren't willing to hear these women out, even when they've

come to them this week, through their attorneys and said, "I have witnesses that are willing

to come to DC and testify before the committee", they're not even responding to those messages.

They're ignoring it, pretending it doesn't exist.

And that is exactly what's going to happen to Dr. Christine Ford tomorrow during her

testimony, and then again on Thursday during the vote on Kavanaugh.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét